De Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre
Saltar a navegación Saltar a búsqueda

La siguiente es una tabla de muchas de las palabras y raíces más fundamentales del lenguaje protoindoeuropeo (PIE), con sus afines en todas las familias principales de descendientes.

Notas [ editar ]

Se utilizan las siguientes convenciones:

  • Los cognados se dan en general en el idioma más antiguo y bien documentado de cada familia, aunque las formas en los idiomas modernos se dan para familias en las que las etapas más antiguas de los idiomas están mal documentadas o no difieren significativamente de las lenguas modernas. Además, se proporcionan formas modernas en inglés con fines comparativos.
  • Los sustantivos se dan en su caso nominativo, con el caso genitivo entre paréntesis cuando su raíz difiere de la del nominativo. (Para algunos idiomas, especialmente el sánscrito, la raíz básica se da en lugar del nominativo).
  • Los verbos se dan en su "forma de diccionario". La forma exacta dada depende del idioma específico:
  • En lugar de América, un osco o de Umbría afines en ocasiones se da cuando no existe una correspondiente análogo América. De manera similar, ocasionalmente se puede dar un análogo de otra lengua de Anatolia (p. Ej. , Luviano , licio ) en lugar o además del hitita.
  • En el caso de Tocharian, los cognados Tocharian A y Tocharian B se dan siempre que sea posible.
  • Para las lenguas celtas , cuando es posible, se dan los cognados tanto del irlandés antiguo como del galés . Para el galés, normalmente se da la forma moderna , pero ocasionalmente se proporciona la forma del galés antiguo cuando se conoce y muestra características importantes perdidas en la forma moderna. Se da un cognado del irlandés medio cuando se desconoce la forma del irlandés antiguo , y ocasionalmente se pueden dar los cognados galo , de Cornualles y / o bretón (moderno) en lugar o además del galés.
  • Para las lenguas bálticas , cuando es posible, se dan los cognados lituano (moderno) y antiguo prusiano . (Tanto el lituano como el antiguo prusiano están incluidos porque el lituano a menudo incluye información que falta en el antiguo prusiano, por ejemplo, debido a la falta de acentos escritos en este último.) De manera similar a la situación celta, las formas del antiguo lituano se pueden dar ocasionalmente en lugar del lituano moderno; El letón (moderno) se puede dar ocasionalmente en lugar o además del lituano.
  • Para las lenguas eslavas , cuando es posible, se dan los cognados del antiguo eslavo eclesiástico . Las formas de las lenguas eslavas modernas o de otros dialectos eslavos eclesiásticos se pueden dar ocasionalmente en lugar del eslavo eclesiástico antiguo.
  • Para el inglés , se da un cognado en inglés moderno cuando existe, junto con la forma correspondiente en inglés antiguo ; de lo contrario, solo se proporciona un formulario en inglés antiguo.
  • Para gótica , una forma en otra lengua germánica ( nórdico antiguo , el antiguo alto alemán , o alto alemán medio ) se da a veces en su lugar, o además, cuando revela características importantes.

Parentesco [ editar ]

Personas [ editar ]

Pronombres y partículas [ editar ]

Números [ editar ]

Partes del cuerpo [ editar ]

Animales [ editar ]

Agricultura [ editar ]

Funciones y estados corporales [ editar ]

Funciones y estados mentales [ editar ]

Características naturales [ editar ]

Directions[edit]

Basic adjectives[edit]

Construction, fabrication[edit]

Self-motion, rest[edit]

Object motion[edit]

Time[edit]

Footnotes[edit]

  1. ^ kʿoyr < *swesōr; kʿeʿ < *swesros; kʿor-kʿ < *swesŏres.
  2. ^ Varias García (2017) pointed out that a tablet from Mycene uses "tu-ka-te", whereas tablets from Knossos, Pylos and Thebes use "ko-wa" (*korwa, later koré 'maiden, girl').[6]
  3. ^ Although this word is attested in Hittite, it is considered a loanword from Luwian. While scholarship recognizes the likelihood of its being the reflex of the root in Anatolian, its appearance in Hittite and Luwian would indicate a different meaning, however.[10][11]
  4. ^ The root could also be found in Anatolian languages with later attestation: Isaurian personal name Τουάτρης Touatris; Pisidian name Δωταρι Dotari.[12]
  5. ^ Other interpretations are "son of the yew" or "son of the boar".[13]
  6. ^ The word is attested in Plate III of the Botorrita plaques. Patricia de Bernardo Stempel interprets "-SUNOS" as the remnant of the root in the Celtic branch.[14][15]
  7. ^ This is the other possible attestation of the root in the Celtic branch.[16]
  8. ^ bridegome in Middle English, subsequently influenced by groom (archaically "servant, man").
  9. ^ These reflexes are suggested by Belarusian scholar Siarhiej Sanko.[19]
  10. ^ See also Thr goni "woman".[20]
  11. ^ See also Phry knaiko, knaikan "woman".[21]
  12. ^ hēm- < *ām- (with h- after hum- "you (pl.)") < *asm- < *n̥sm-.
  13. ^ Cf. Latin ne-que, Gothic ni-h, Hittite ni-kku, Lydian ni-k "and not, nor".
  14. ^ For example, qñnã-tba "twelve" (litt. "ten" plus "two").[30]
  15. ^ See also: Umb peturpursus "quadruped".
  16. ^ Cf. Thr ketri- "four".[33]
  17. ^ See also: Osc pomp- "five".[35]
  18. ^ See also Phry pinke "five".[37]
  19. ^ Built upon osmŭ "eighth" < *H₁ok̂t-mo-.
  20. ^ With nasalization after *septḿ̥ "seven".
  21. ^ There is the possibility that Lycian sñta could mean either "ten" or "(one) hundred". [46][47]
  22. ^ Influenced by zǝrǝd "heart".
  23. ^ Possible Anatolian reflex of the root, as posited by a recent publication.[56]
  24. ^ Only in *aíƕatundi "bramble", literally "horse-tooth".
  25. ^ Expected form is *vōs, not *bōs; evidently this is a borrowing from Oscan or Umbrian.
  26. ^ bóu, báu are archaic genitives; later báo, bó.
  27. ^ Cf. also Phry ἔξις or ἔζις (ezi) "hedgehog".
  28. ^ In ancient Roman tradition, the Avernus was a lake where birds died as they flew near it.
  29. ^ See also Illyrian tribal name Enchele "eel-people".
  30. ^ The name migrated to Eastern Europe,[75] assumed the form "azhdaja" and the meaning "dragon", "dragoness"[76] or "water snake"[77] in Balkanic and Slavic languages.[78]
  31. ^ Cf. Sanskrit janitár-, Greek genetḗr, genétōr, Latin genitor "procreator".
  32. ^ Cf. Asteria (litt.) "starry one"; Astraeus "god of dusk" (litt. "starry"); Astraea "star-maiden"; Cretan king Asterion "starry".
  33. ^ acc. stā̆rǝm, gen. stārō, pl. nom. staras-ča, stārō, acc. strǝ̄uš, gen. strǝ̄m, dat. stǝrǝbyō.
  34. ^ Tīw < *deiwos was the Germanic god of war, but originally was a sky-god and head of the gods, like Zeus.
  35. ^ *deiwos > Lat. deus; gen. *deiwī > Lat. dīvī. From each stem a full declension was formed.
  36. ^ According to linguist Vitaly Shevoroshkin, the noun exists in other Anatolian languages: Lycian ziw-; Lydian civ-; Luwian Tiwa-; Palaic Tija-.[88]
  37. ^ Other dialectal variants are Cretan awélios or ābélios; Doric āélios.
  38. ^ Cf. Thracian river name Struma and river-god Strymon; Illyrian toponyms Stravianae and Strevintia; Lith. (dial.) river name Straujà; Old Prussian place-names Strewe, Stromyke and Strowange.[93] Stravianae (or Stravijanu) is tentatively located by scholars near the modern day city of Našice, in east Croatia.[94]
  39. ^ The literal meaning is "place between the rivers".
  40. ^ Scholarly opinion seems to agree that the word must have referred to a large body of water.
  41. ^ Etymon rudá appears in idiomatic expressions denoting "anger".[98]
  42. ^ Latin etymons galbus ("yellow") and galbinus ("greenish-yellow") are also suggested to derive from this root.[104]
  43. ^ See also: Phr glouros "gold".[105][106]
  44. ^ Cf. also Thrac arzas "white".[109]
  45. ^ wagon is a loan-word from Dutch.
  46. ^ See also Hesperus "evening star"; Hesperides "daughters of the evening; nymphs of the west".
  47. ^ Attested in the Coligny calendar, written in Gaulish language.
  48. ^ Douglas Q. Adams reads the words as "winter, wintry", although there are other interpretations.[118][119]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Zair, Nicholas. The Reflexes of the Proto-Indo-European Laryngeals in Celtic. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill. 2012. p. 110. ISBN 978-90-04-22539-8
  2. ^ Campbell, George L. with King, Gareth. Compendium of the World's Languages. Routledge. 2013. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-415-62191-5
  3. ^ Witczak, Krzysztof Tomasz. "Gaulish SUIOREBE ‘with two sisters’". In: Lingua Posnaniensis. LVII (2). 2015. pp. 59-62. DOI: 10.1515/linpo-2015-0011
  4. ^ Kloekhorst, Alwin. "The accentuation of the PIE word for ‘daughter’". In: Accent Matters. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill|Rodopi, 2011. pp. 235–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401200325_009
  5. ^ García, Carlos Varias. "De synonymia Mycenaea: términos griegos equivalentes de distintos reinos micénicos". In: Conuentus Classicorum: temas y formas del Mundo Clásico. Coord. por Jesús de la Villa, Emma Falque Rey, José Francisco González Castro, María José Muñoz Jiménez, Vol. 1, 2017. pp. 382-383. ISBN 978-84-697-8214-9
  6. ^ García, Carlos Varias. "De synonymia Mycenaea: términos griegos equivalentes de distintos reinos micénicos". In: Conuentus Classicorum: temas y formas del Mundo Clásico. Coord. por Jesús de la Villa, Emma Falque Rey, José Francisco González Castro, María José Muñoz Jiménez, Vol. 1, 2017. p. 388. ISBN 978-84-697-8214-9
  7. ^ Bernardo Stempel, Patrizia de. "Celtic ‘son’, ‘daughter’, other descendants, and *sunus in Early Celtic". In: Indogermanische Forschungen 118, 2013 (2013): 259-298, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/indo.2013.118.2013.259
  8. ^ Stifter, David (2006). "Contributions to Celtiberian Etymology II". In: Palaeohispanica: revista sobre lenguas y culturas de la Hispania Antigua, 6. pp. 238. ISSN 1578-5386
  9. ^ Oshiro, Terumasa. "On Kinship Terms in Hieroglyphic Luwian". In: Orient. Report of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan 26. 1990. p. 90-91.
  10. ^ Milanova, Veronika. "Chapter 13: MUNUS/fduttarii̯ata/i- and Some Other Indo-European Maidens". In: Hrozný and Hittite: The First Hundred Years. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2019. pp. 277–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004413122_015
  11. ^ Kloekhorst, Alwin. Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon. Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 5. Leiden, The Netherlands; Boston, 2008. pp. 1042-1044. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/11996
  12. ^ Blažek, Václav. “Indo-European kinship terms in *-ə̯2TER.” (2001). In: Grammaticvs: studia linguistica Adolfo Erharto quinque et septuagenario oblata. Šefčík, Ondřej (editor); Vykypěl, Bohumil (editor). Vyd. 1. V Brně: Masarykova univerzita, 2001. p. 25. http://hdl.handle.net/11222.digilib/123188
  13. ^ Schrijver, P. C. H. (2015). "The meaning of Celtic *eburos". In: Oudaer, Guillaume, Hily, Gael, Le Bihan, Herve (eds.). Mélanges en l'honneur de Pierre-Yves Lambert. pp. 65-76. ISBN 978-2-917681-27-5
  14. ^ Bernardo Stempel, Patrizia de. "Celtic ‘son’, ‘daughter’, other descendants, and *sunus in Early Celtic". In: Indogermanische Forschungen 118, 2013 (2013): 259-298. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/indo.2013.118.2013.259
  15. ^ de Bernardo Stempel Patrizia (2013). "«El Tercer Bronce De Botorrita, Veinte Años Después»". In: Palaeohispanica: Revista Sobre Lenguas Y Culturas De La Hispania Antigua. n.º 13 (julio). p. 645. https://ifc.dpz.es/ojs/index.php/palaeohispanica/article/view/186.
  16. ^ Danka, Ignacy Ryszard & Witczak, Krzysztof Tomasz (2010). "Deis Equeunubo – The Divine Twins in Asturia". In: Stalmaszczyk, Piotr & Fomin, Maxim (eds.). Dimensions and Categories of Celticity: Studies in Language. Studia celto-Slavica 4. Łódź: Łódź University Press. 2010. 17-26.
  17. ^ "вуйко - Словник української мови - значення слова, це:". УКРЛІТ.ORG. Retrieved 2021-02-07.
  18. ^ Vertegaal, Alexander. "Syllable Weight Gradation in the Luwic Languages". In: Transactions of the Philological Society Volume 118, Issue 2. p. 212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12186
  19. ^ SAŃKO, Siarhiej, and Aliaksej Shota. "PODSTAWOWE SKŁADNIKI BIAŁORUSKIEJ NARRACJI SAKRALNEJ W PERSPEKTYWIE PORÓWNAWCZEJ." Politeja, no. 22 (2012): 167. Accessed March 3, 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24920134.
  20. ^ Dimitrov, Peter A. (2009). "The Thracian Inscriptions". Thracian Language and Greek and Thracian Epigraphy. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 18. ISBN 978-1-4438-1325-9.
  21. ^ Woudhuizen, Fred C. "Phrygian & Greek". In: Talanta XL-XLI (2008-2009). p. 187.
  22. ^ Blazek, Václav. "Gaulish Language". In: Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitais Brunensis. n. 13. 2008. p. 53.
  23. ^ Puhvel, Jaan. Hittite Etymological Dictionary - Volume 4: Words beginning with Κ. Trends in Linguistics 14. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1997. pp. 306-308. Parameter error in {{ISBN}}: Missing ISBN.
  24. ^ Melchert, Harold Craig. Anatolian Historical Phonology. Amsterdam; Atlanta, GA: Rodopi. 1994. p. 264. ISBN 90-5183-697-X
  25. ^ Woudhuizen, Fred C. "Two Notes on Lydian". In: TALANTA XLII - XLIII (2010-2011). p. 211.
  26. ^ *us-we is the original form, modified to *us-me in many languages under the influence of 1st. pl. *n̥s-mé. Very often when *us-we remained, the initial u- was lost; this happened at least in Germanic, Avestan and Celtic.
  27. ^ a b OE ēow (acc., dat.) and ēow-ic̣ (acc., with the same -c̣ ending visible in 1st. sg. acc. mēc̣ "me", also modern German mich "me"), likewise Old High German iuwih "you (acc./dat. pl.)" (modern euch), appear to have the same origin as izw- in Gothic izwis "you (acc./dat. pl)", with unexplained loss of -z-. izwis appears to come from stem izw- plus originally genitive -is, where izw- comes ultimately from PIE *us-we with the loss of u- also visible in Avestan and Celtic, followed by the addition of a prothetic i-. (Ringe, 2006)
  28. ^ Fournet, Arnaud (2010). "About the Mitanni Aryan gods". Journal of Indo-European Studies. 38 (1–2): 26-27.
  29. ^ All suggested etymologies of një "one" are highly speculative, at best. This etymology is one of two given by E. Hamp in Indo-European Numerals (Jadranka Gvozdanović, ed., 1992), pp. 903-904; the other is simply from PIE *eni- (or H₂en-), a PIE deictic particle visible in Sanskrit anyá- "the other", OCS onŭ "that one", Lithuanian anàs "that one". Michiel de Vaan, in a review of Demiraj's Sistemi i numerimit, suggests PIE *H₂en-io-no- > pre-Proto-Albanian *ëńán > Proto-Albanian *ńâ > një. M. Huld (Basic Albanian Etymologies, p. 101) attempts to derive një from PIE *sm-iH₂, feminine of *sem "one" and reflected in Ancient Greek mía; this etymology is also tentatively suggested in Don Ringe et al. "IE and Computational Cladistics", p. 75 (Transactions of the Philological Society 100, 2002).
  30. ^ Shevoroshkin, Vitaly. "Anatolian laryngeals in Milyan". In: The Sound of Indo-European: Phonetics, Phonemics, and Morphophonemics. Edited by Benedicte Nielsen Whitehead. Museum Tusculanum Press. 2012. p. 481. ISBN 978-87-635-3838-1
  31. ^ Kassian, Alexei. "Anatolian *meyu- ‘4, four’ and its cognates". In: Journal of Language Relationship 2 (2009). pp. 68 (footnote nr. 9), 69.
  32. ^ Accent location unknown.
  33. ^ Duridanov, Ivan (1985). Die Sprache der Thraker. Bulgarische Sammlung (in German). 5. Hieronymus Verlag. p. 60. ISBN 3-88893-031-6.
  34. ^ Blazek, Václav. "Gaulish Language". In: Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitais Brunensis. n. 13. 2008. p. 60.
  35. ^ HOLMER, N. M. (1990), “The semantics of numerals”. In: Fontes linguae vasconum, 22: 16.
  36. ^ Fournet, Arnaud (2010). "About the Mitanni Aryan gods". Journal of Indo-European Studies. 38 (1–2): 26-27.
  37. ^ Woudhuizen, Fred C. "Phrygian & Greek". In: Talanta XL-XLI (2008-2009). p. 189.
  38. ^ Blazek, Václav. "Gaulish Language". In: Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitais Brunensis. n. 13. 2008. p. 60.
  39. ^ Blazek, Václav. "Gaulish Language". In: Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitais Brunensis. n. 13. 2008. p. 60.
  40. ^ Fournet, Arnaud (2010). "About the Mitanni Aryan gods". Journal of Indo-European Studies. 38 (1–2): 26-27.
  41. ^ Blazek, Václav. "Gaulish Language". In: Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitais Brunensis. n. 13. 2008. p. 60.
  42. ^ Craig Melchert stated: "Meriggi, 'Fs Hirt' 266, suggests 'eighty' and 'ninety' respectively for aitãta and nuñtata ... 'Eight' and 'nine' are not only more reasonable contextually ... The remaining *aita- and *nuñta- may be derived from *ok̂tō and *néwn̥ ... " Melchert, H. Craig. "New Luvo-Lycian Isoglosses". In: Historische Sprachforschung. 102 Band. 1 Heft. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 1989. pp. 24-25. ISSN 0935-3518
  43. ^ "This numeral ... is obviously derived from the word for "nine". (...) The etymological connection with PIE *newn ... is evident ...". Eichner, Heiner. "Anatolian". In: Gvozdanovic, Jadranka (ed.). Indo-European numerals. Trends in linguistics: Studies and monographs n. 57. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 1991. p. 87. ISBN 3-11-011322-8
  44. ^ Blazek, Václav. "Gaulish Language". In: Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitais Brunensis. n. 13. 2008. p. 60.
  45. ^ Wodtko, d. S. "Remarks on Celtiberian Etymology". In: Villar, Francisco y Beltrán, Francisco (eds.). Pueblos, lengua y escrituras en la Hispania Prerromana. Actas del VII Coloquio sobre lenguas y culturas paleohispánicas (Zaragoza, 12 a 15 de Marzo de 1997). Ediciones Universidad Salamanca. 1999. p. 734. ISBN 84-7800-094-1
  46. ^ Melchert, H. Craig. "New Luvo-Lycian Isoglosses". In: Historische Sprachforschung. 102 Band. 1 Heft. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. 1989. pp. 24-25. ISSN 0935-3518
  47. ^ Anthony, David W. (2007). The Horse, the Wheel, and Language: How Bronze-Age Riders from the Eurasian Steppes Shaped the Modern World. Princeton University Press. p. 28. ISBN 978-1400831104
  48. ^ Raham Asha, Phonology of Pārsīg
  49. ^ Filippone, Ela. "The Gums of the Teeth in the Iranian Languages". In: Mélanges d’ethnographie et de dialectologie Irano-Aryennes à la mémoire de Charles-Martin Kieffer. Studia Iranica, Cahier 61. Edited by Matteo De Chiara, Adriano V. Rossi, and Daniel Septfonds. Leuven: Peeters. 2018. p. 163.
  50. ^ https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.04.0057%3Aentry%3Do%29%2Fkkon
  51. ^ Morpurgo Davies, Anna, and J. David Hawkins. "A Luwian Heart". In: F. Imparati (ed.). Studi di storia e di filologia anatolica dedicate a Giovanni Pugliese Carratelli. Firenze: Elite. 1988. pp. 169-182.
  52. ^ Hamp, Eric P. "Indo-European *kreuH-". In: Indogermanische Forschungen 82, 1977 (1977): 75-76, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110243246.75
  53. ^ Kuiper, F. B. J. "Old East Iranian Dialects". In: Indo-Iranian Journal 18, no. 3/4 (1976): 241-53. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24652490.
  54. ^ Mallory, James P.; Adams, Douglas Q. (1997). Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. London: Routledge. p. 71. ISBN 978-1-884964-98-5.
  55. ^ Handbook of Comparative and Historical Indo-European Linguistics. Edited by Jared Klein, Brian Joseph, Matthias Fritz. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. 2018. p. 1647. ISBN 978-3-11-054036-9
  56. ^ Sasseville, David. Anatolian Verbal Stem Formation: Luwian, Lycian and Lydian. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2020. pp. 191-193 and 562. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004436299_006
  57. ^ Puhvel, Jaan. "Shaft-shedding Artemis and Mind-voiding Ate: Hittite Determinants of Greek Etyma." Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics 105, no. 1 (1992): 4. Accessed July 13, 2020. www.jstor.org/stable/40849348.
  58. ^ Duhoux, Yves. "Minos. Revista de Filologia Egea [compte-rendu]". In: L'antiquité classique, Tome 60, 1991. p. 717. www.persee.fr/doc/antiq_0770-2817_1991_num_60_1_2329_t1_0716_0000_2
  59. ^ a b c Complex ablauting stem:
  60. ^ De Decker, Filip. "Stang’s Law and the Indo-European word for “cow”". In: Indogermanische Forschungen 116, 2011 (2011): 42-59, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110239485.42
  61. ^ Blažek, Václav. "Indo-European “bear”". In: Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics 130 (2017): 148-92. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26532668.
  62. ^ Peeters, Chr. "The Word for ‘dog’ and the Sequence *wH + Gonsonant in Indo-European". In: Indogermanische Forschungen 78, 1973 (1973): 75-77, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110243208.75
  63. ^ Delgado, José Miguel Jiménez. "The Etymology of Myc. Ku-na-ke-ta-i, Ion.-Att. κυνηγέτης, and Myc. Ra-wa-ke-ta, Dor. γᾱγέτᾱς". In: Glotta 91 (2015): 116-28. Accessed March 20, 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24368212.
  64. ^ Watkins, Calvert. "Proto-Indo-European: Comparison and Reconstruction". In: The Indo-European Languages. Edited by Anna Giacalone Ramat and Paolo Ramat. Routledge. 1998. p. 54. ISBN 0-415-06449-X
  65. ^ Orel, Vladimir. Albanian Etymological Dictionary. Leiden, Boston, Cologne: Brill. p. 81.
  66. ^ BLAŽEK, Václav. "Baltic and Slavic "fox"". Linguistica Baltica. Kraków: TAiWPN Universitas, 1998, vol. 7, No 1. p. 25. ISSN 1230-3984
  67. ^ BLAŽEK, Václav. "Baltic and Slavic "fox"". Linguistica Baltica. Kraków: TAiWPN Universitas, 1998, vol. 7, No 1. p. 25. ISSN 1230-3984
  68. ^ Curchin, Leonard A. "Place-names of the Ebro Valley: their linguistic origins". In: Palaeohispánica: Revista sobre lenguas y culturas de la Hispania antigua. Nº. 8. 2008. p. 16 (footnote nr. 5). ISSN 1578-5386
  69. ^ Pinault, Georges-Jean Pinault; Winter, Werner. Dictionary and Thesaurus of Tocharian A. Volume I: A-J. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 2009. p. 173. ISBN 978-3-447-05814-8
  70. ^ Peyrot, Michaël. "Chapter 12: A Comparison of the Tocharian A and B Metrical Traditions*". In: Language and Meter. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004357778_014
  71. ^ Collins, Billie Jean. "On the Trail of the Dee: Hittite kurāla-". In: Hittite Studies in Honor of Harry A. Hoffner, Jr: On the Occasion of His 65th Birthday. Edited by Gary Beckman, Richard Beal and Gregory McMahon. Winona Lake, Indiana: Eisenbrauns. 2003. p. 80. ISBN 1-57506-079-5
  72. ^ Ventris, Michael; Chadwick, John. Documents in Mycenaean Greek. Cambridge at the University Press. 1956. p. 96. ISBN 978-0-521-08558-8
  73. ^ "БОБЕР - тлумачення, орфографія, новий правопис онлайн". slovnyk.ua. Retrieved 2021-02-07.
  74. ^ Vertegaal, Alexander. "Syllable Weight Gradation in the Luwic Languages". In: Transactions of the Philological Society Volume 118, Issue 2. pp. 214-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12186
  75. ^ Detelić, Mirjana. "St Paraskeve in the Balkan Context" In: Folklore 121, no. 1 (2010): 101 (footnote nr. 12). Accessed March 24, 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/29534110.
  76. ^ Erben, Karel Jaromír; Strickland, Walter William. Russian and Bulgarian folk-lore stories. London: G. Standring. 1907. p. 130.
  77. ^ Kropej, Monika. Supernatural beings from Slovenian myth and folktales. Ljubljana: Institute of Slovenian Ethnology at ZRC SAZU. 2012. p. 102. ISBN 978-961-254-428-7
  78. ^ Kappler, Matthias. Turkish Language Contacts in Southeastern Europe. Piscataway, NJ, USA: Gorgias Press, 2010. p. 256. https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463225612
  79. ^ Dictionnaire Illustré Latin-Français, Hachette (1934) p.960
  80. ^ Vycinas, Vincent. Search for Gods. Springer, Dordrecht. 1972. p. 33. ISBN 978-94-010-2816-5
  81. ^ Kristin Meier, and Michaël Peyrot. "The Word for ‘Honey’ in Chinese, Tocharian and Sino-Vietnamese". In: Zeitschrift Der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 167, no. 1 (2017): 7-22. doi:10.13173/zeitdeutmorggese.167.1.0007.
  82. ^ a b c A synchronic rule in PIE deleted laryngeals in the sequence VRHy or R̥Hy.
  83. ^ Mallory, James P.; Adams, Douglas Q. (1997). Encyclopedia of Indo-European Culture. London: Routledge. p. 527. ISBN 978-1-884964-98-5
  84. ^ Kocharov, Petr. "Proto-Indo-European lexical aspect and stem patterns", Faits de Langues 47, 1 (2016): 83, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-047-01-900000005
  85. ^ Kocharov, Petr. "Proto-Indo-European lexical aspect and stem patterns", Faits de Langues 47, 1 (2016): 83, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-047-01-900000005
  86. ^ a b c Complex ablauting stem:
  87. ^ Lurker, Manfred (2004). A Dictionary of Gods and Goddesses, Devils and Demons. Routledge. p. 325. ISBN 0-415-03943-6
  88. ^ Shevoroshkin, Vitaly (1978). "Studies in Hittite-Luwian Names". In: Names: A Journal of Onomastics 26:3. pp. 231-232. DOI: 10.1179/nam.1978.26.3.231
  89. ^ Still scanned as three syllables in some passages of the Rigveda, Ringe (2006) p. 77.
  90. ^ Ringe (2006) p. 77, sourced to Melchert (1994) p. 54.
  91. ^ a b c d It is unclear how the original PIE forms produced the attested daughter-language forms. After the loss of laryngeals, original *péH₂wr̥, pH₂unés would regularly produce *pāwr̥, punés. It is possible that this form was considered too strange-looking, with the result that the u vowel was borrowed from the second stem into the first, yielding *púwr̥, punés. This compressed to *pūr, punés, and this stem set, or its regularized version *pūr, purés, might form the basis of the Umbrian, Greek and Armenian forms. For Germanic, however, something else must be at work. Ringe (2006) suggests that the following sequence of events produced Gothic fōn: Collective péH₂wōr -> pH₂uṓr (cf. Tocharian B puwar) > puōr > Proto-Germanic fuwōr > fwōr > fōr -> fōn (using -n- from the oblique stem), where -> indicates a change due to analogy, while > indicates a regular sound change. His explanation of funins and fuïr is very tentative and complicated. Pokorny's suggestion for Germanic is rather different. He derives fōn from *fwōn, with no further derivation, but probably different from Ringe's. fuïr comes from *puweri, a locative that could be formed from a nominative *púwr̥ or possibly from a stem *pur-. It suffices to say that the processes involved are not well understood.
  92. ^ Panaino, Antonio. "The Ancient Iranian Cosmography and its Evolution". In: A Walk Through the Iranian Heavens. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. 2019. pp. 54-55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004460690_007
  93. ^ Birnbaum, Henrik. Problems of Typological and Genetic Linguistics Viewed in a Generative Framework. The Hague; Paris: Mouton. 1970. p. 116.
  94. ^ Gračanin, Hrvoje. "Rimske prometnice i komunikacije u kasnoantičkoj južnoj Panoniji" [Roman Roads and Communications in Late Antique South Pannonia]. In: Scrinia Slavonica 10, br. 1 (2010): 35 and footnote n.r 128. https://hrcak.srce.hr/77178
  95. ^ Martirosyan, Hrach (2013). "The place of Armenian in the Indo-European language family: the relationship with Greek and Indo-Iranian*". In: Journal of Language Relationship [Вопросы языкового родства]] 10 (2013). p. 94.
  96. ^ a b *H₁le(n)gʷʰ- and *H₁reudʰ- are both roots that form Caland-type adjectives. These roots are notable in that they form zero-stem adjectives with certain characteristic suffixes, especially -ro- and -u-, along with -i- in compounds. Other examples are *H₂erĝ- "white" (cf. Greek argós < *argrós "white", Sanskrit ṛjrá- "brilliant", Tocharian B ārkwi "white", Greek argi-kéraunos "with bright lightning") and *dʰeub- "deep" (cf. Lithuanian dubùs "hollow" < *dʰub-u-, Tocharian B tapre "high" < *dhub-ro-).
  97. ^ García Ramón, J. L. "Mycenaean onomastics". In: A Companion to Linear B: Mycenaean Greek Texts and their World. Volume 2. Edited by Yves Duhoux and Anna Morpurgo Davies. Bibliothèque des Cahiers de l'Institut de Linguistique de Louvain. Peeters: Louvain-la-Neuve – Walpole, MA. 2011. p. 215, 223.
  98. ^ Uusküla, Mari. "The Basic Color Terms of Czech". In: TRAMES 2008. 12(62/57). 1. p. 24. DOI:10.3176/tr.2008.1.01
  99. ^ Jasińska, Katarzyna; Piwowarczyk, Dariusz R. "The Indo-European heritage in Modern Polish – introductory remarks". In: The Indo-European legacy in language and culture. eds. A. Dudziak, A. Zlobin, M. Payunena. Olsztyn: Wydawnictwo UWM, 2019. p. 196.
  100. ^ Stifter, David. "Study in red". In: Sprache 40/2 (1998), pp. 202–223.
  101. ^ Cólera, Carlos Jordán (2007). "Celtiberian". e-Keltoi: Journal of Interdisciplinary Celtic Studies. Vol. 6: The Celts in the Iberian Peninsula. Article 17. p. 759. ISSN 1540-4889 Available at: https://dc.uwm.edu/ekeltoi/vol6/iss1/17.
  102. ^ Blažek, Vacláv. (2017). "Indo-European ‘Gold’ in Time and Space". In: Journal of Indo-European Studies (JIES) 45: 267-312.
  103. ^ Prósper, Blanca Maria. "Proto-Italic laryngeals in the context CLHC- and new Italic and Celtic etymological connections". In: Rivista italiana di linguistica e di dialettologia: XIX, 2017. Pisa: Fabrizio Serra, 2017. pp. 79-101. http://digital.casalini.it/10.19272/201704801004; https://doi.org/10.19272/201704801004
  104. ^ Tsaregorodtseva Oksana. "Semantic processes in derivatives of the etymological root *ghel- (*ghel-) / *glEnd(h)- to shine, to sparkle". Language and Culture, no. 1, 2014. pp. 69-74. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/semantic-processes-in-derivatives-of-the-etymological-root-ghel-ghel-glend-h-to-shine-to-sparkle (дата обращения: 04.12.2020).
  105. ^ Forston, Benjamin W. Indo-European Language and Culture: An Introduction. Blackwell Publishing. 2010. p. 461. ISBN 978-1-4051-8895-1
  106. ^ Sowa, Wojciech. "A Note to "Phrygian" words in Greek". In: Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia Vol. 12. Issue 1. Kraków: 2007. p. 159.
  107. ^ Mallory, J. P., and Martin E. Huld. "Proto-Indo-European ‘Silver’." Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 97, no. 1 (1984): 1-12. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40848726.
  108. ^ Ventris, Michael; Chadwick, John. Documents in Mycenaean Greek. Cambridge at the University Press. 1956. p. 374. ISBN 978-0-521-08558-8
  109. ^ Duridanov, Ivan (1985). Die Sprache der Thraker. Bulgarische Sammlung (in German). 5. Hieronymus Verlag. p. 74. ISBN 3-88893-031-6.
  110. ^ Erkut, Sedat. "Hititçe Kugulla Sözcüğü" [The Hittite Word kugulla-]. In: Tarih Araştırmaları Dergisi 25 (2006): 107-111. <https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tariharastirmalari/issue/47798/603785>
  111. ^ Chadwick, John, and Baumbach, Lydia. "The Mycenaean Greek Vocabulary". In: Glotta 41, no. 3/4 (1963): 223. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40265918.
  112. ^ Lühr, Rosemarie. "Spinne am Morgen bringt Kummer und Sorgen". In: Denkströme: Journal der Sächsischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 13 (2014). Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag. 2014. p. 23. ISSN 1867-6413
  113. ^ Haruyuki Saito. Das Partizipium Präteriti im Tocharischen. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. 2006. pp. 556-557. ISBN 3-447-05330-5
  114. ^ Kim, Ronald I. "Old English Cyme and the Proto‐Indo‐European Aorist Optative in Germanic". In: Transactions of the Philological Society Volume 117, Issue 1. 2018. p. 99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-968X.12147
  115. ^ "ЛИШИТИ — ЕТИМОЛОГІЯ | Горох — українські словники". goroh.pp.ua (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 2021-02-07.
  116. ^ Blazek, Václav. "Gaulish Language". In: Studia Minora Facultatis Philosophicae Universitais Brunensis. n. 13. 2008. p. 52.
  117. ^ Duval, Paul-Marie. "Observations sur le Calendrier de Coligny", IV. In: Études Celtiques, vol. 11, fascicule 1, 1964. p. 12. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/ecelt.1964.1383]; www.persee.fr/doc/ecelt_0373-1928_1964_num_11_1_1383
  118. ^ Adams, Douglas Q. A Dictionary of Tocharian B: Revised and Greatly Enlarged. Amsterdam - New York, NY: Rodopi. 2013. p. 690. ISBN 978-90-420-3671-0
  119. ^ Adams, Douglas Q. "The Tocharian B word for 'solstice'?". In: Tocharian and Indo-European Studies. Vol. 12. Museum Tusculanum Press, University of Copenhagen. 2011. pp. 48-49. ISBN 978-87-635-3649-3
  120. ^ Ching, Chao-jung. "On the Word ṣau Found in the Kuchean Secular Documents". In: Great Journeys across the Pamir Mountains. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2018. p. 3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004362253_002

Bibliography[edit]

  • Delamarre, Xavier. Le Vocabulaire Indo-Européen. Paris: Librairie d'Amérique et d'Orient. 1984. ISBN 2-7200-1028-6
  • Kloekhorst, Alwin. Etymological Dictionary of the Hittite Inherited Lexicon. Leiden Indo-European Etymological Dictionary Series 5. Leiden, The Netherlands; Boston, 2008. https://hdl.handle.net/1887/11996
  • Matasovic, Ranko. Etymological Dictionary Of Proto Celtic. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. 2009. ISBN 978-90-04-17336-1

Further reading[edit]

On numerals:

  • Bjørn, Rasmus. "Nouns and Foreign Numerals: Anatolian ‘Four’ and the Development of the PIE Decimal System". In: Dispersals and Diversification. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2019. pp. 54–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004416192_004
  • Bomhard, Allan R. "Some thoughts on the Proto-Indo-European cardinal numbers". In: In Hot Pursuit of Language in Prehistory: Essays in the four fields of anthropology. In honor of Harold Crane Fleming. Edited by John D. Bengtson. John Benjamins Publishing Company. 2008. pp. 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1075/z.145.18bom
  • Prósper, Blanca María. "The Indo-european ordinal numerals 'fourth' and 'fifth' and the reconstruction of the Celtic and Italic numeral systems". In: Die Sprache Vol. 51, Nº. 1, 2014-2015, pp. 1-50. ISSN 0376-401X
  • de Vaan, Michiel. "Proto-Indo-European *sm and *si ‘one’". In: The Precursors of Proto-Indo-European. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill|Rodopi, 2019. pp. 203–218. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004409354_015

On nature and the passage of time:

  • Huld, Martin E. "Proto- and Post-Indo-European Designations for ‘sun’." Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 99, no. 2 (1986): 194-202. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40848835.
  • Maciuszak, Kinga (2002). “The Names of Seasons of the Year in Iranian Languages”. In: Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia 7: 67-78.

On animals:

  • Gąsiorowski, Piotr. "Gruit grus: The Indo-European names of the crane". In: Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia Vol. 18. Issue 1. 2013. pp. 51-68. DOI: 10.4467/20843836SE.13.003.0940
  • Hammer, Niels. "Eurasian Cranes, Demoiselle Cranes, PIE *ger- and Onomatopoetics". In: The Journal of Indo-European Studies (JIES), Vol. 43, nº. 1-2, 2015. pp. 81-99. ISSN 0092-2323
  • Huld, Martin E. (2014). "Armenian agṙaw and an Indo-European Word for 'Crow, Raven'. In: JIES 42 (3-4): 294-301.

On kinship and family:

  • Blažek, Václav. "Indo-European *suHnu- 'son' and his relatives". In: Indogermanistik und Linguistik im Dialog. Akten der XIII. Fachtagung der Indogermanischen Gesellschaft von 21. bis 27. September 2008 in Salzburg, hrg. Thomas Krisch & Thomas Lindner. Wiesbaden: Reichert, 2011. pp. 79-89. ISBN 978-3-89500-681-4
  • Cooper, Brian. "The Lexicology and Etymology of Russian Family Relationships". In: Studia Etymologica Cracoviensia Vol. 14. Issue 1. Kraków: 2009. pp. 153-176. ISBN 978-83-233-2758-5
  • Friedrich, Paul. "Proto-Indo-European Kinship." Ethnology 5, no. 1 (1966): 1-36. Accessed November 15, 2020. doi:10.2307/3772899.
  • Galton, Herbert. "The Indo-European Kinship Terminology." Zeitschrift Für Ethnologie 82, no. 1 (1957): 121-38. Accessed November 15, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25840433.
  • Hettrich, Heinrich. "Indo-European Kinship Terminology in Linguistics and Anthropology." Anthropological Linguistics 27, no. 4 (1985): 453-80. Accessed November 15, 2020. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30028080.
  • Humphreys, S. C. "Proto-Indo-European Kinship and Society: Kin Terms". In: Journal of Indo-European Studies. Washington Vol. 45, Ed. 3/4, (2017): 373-425. ISSN 0092-2323
  • Kullanda, Sergey. "Indo‐European “Kinship Terms” Revisited." Current Anthropology 43, no. 1 (2002): 89-111. Accessed November 15, 2020. doi:10.1086/324127.
  • Milanova, Veronika. "Brothers and Many Others: The Concept ‘Offspring’ and its Semantic Extensions in Indo-European Languages". In: Journal of Indo-European Studies (JIES). Vol. 48/Numbers 1 & 2 (Spring/Summer 2020): 189-217.
  • Rau, Jeremy. "Indo-European Kinship Terminology: *ph₂tr-ou̯-/ph₂tr̥-u̯- and Its Derivatives." Historische Sprachforschung / Historical Linguistics 124 (2011): 1-25. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41553560.
  • Starke, Frank. "Die Vertretungen Von Uridg. *dHUgh₂tér- "Tochter“ in Den Luwischen Sprachen Und Ihre Stammbildung". In: Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Sprachforschung 100, no. 2 (1987): 243-69. Accessed March 8, 2021. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40848875.

On agriculture and produce:

  • Hyllested, Adam. "Did Proto-Indo-European Have a Word for Wheat? Hittite šeppit(t)- Revisited and the Rise of Post-PIE Cereal Terminology". In: Dispersals and Diversification. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2019. pp. 130–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004416192_007
  • Mikić, Aleksandar. "A note on some Proto-Indo-European roots related to grain legumes", Indogermanische Forschungen 116, 2011 (2011): 60-71, doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110239485.60
  • Mikić, Aleksandar. "Palaeolinguistics and Ancient Eurasian Pulse Crops." Current Science 108, no. 1 (2015): 45-50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24216173.
  • Romain Garnier, Laurent Sagart, Benoît Sagot. "Milk and the Indo-Europeans". In: Martine Robeets; Alexander Savalyev. Language Dispersal Beyond Farming. John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2017. pp. 291-311. ISBN 978-90-272-1255-9. ff10.1075/z.215.13garff. ffhal-01667476f

On colors:

  • Shields, Kenneth. “Indo-European Basic Colour Terms.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue Canadienne De Linguistique 24, no. 2 (1979): 142–46. doi:10.1017/S0008413100023409.

On verbs related to action and motion:

  • Verkerk, Annemarie (2015). "Where do all the motion verbs come from? The speed of development of manner verbs and path verbs in Indo-European". In: Diachronica, 32(1): 69-104. doi:10.1075/dia.32.1.03ver.

On bodily functions:

  • Kocharov, Petr. "Proto-Indo-European lexical aspect and stem patterns". Faits de Langues 47, 1 (2016): 75-88, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/19589514-047-01-900000005 [on PIE roots for sleep and dream]

External links[edit]

  • https://web.archive.org/web/20101210072140/http://www.indo-european.nl/cgi-bin/startq.cgi?flags=endnnnl&root=leiden&basename=%5Cdata%5Cie%5Cpokorny Query Julius Pokorny's landmark Indogermanisches Etymologisches Wörterbuch, the standard reference for Indo-European vocabulary. Complete coverage of cognates of each root (although Hittite and Tocharian coverage is spotty), highly accurate forms. Beware, roots are given in pre-laryngeal form and glosses are in German.
  • American Heritage Indo-European Roots Index
  • Database query to the online version of Pokorny's PIE dictionary
  • Index to the online version of Pokorny's PIE dictionary
  • Jonathan Slocum, Indo-European Lexicon from the University of Texas Linguistic Research Center
  • Dougas Harper's Etymonline