Talk:Wrigley Building

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 03:49, 4 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If anyone wants to do this, please take a photograph of the entrance to the British Consulate on the 13th floor of the Wrigley Building. The photo would be for this article. WhisperToMe (talk) 00:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I get the foreign consulates being listed as they are government related. But if we start adding to the list with every tenant, it starts to look like a directory page for the building's management company. Any thoughts on the matter?Ryecatcher773 (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GenQuest, CSZero, and John M Wolfson:I am looking for opinions regarding the infobox image. I propose changing the existing photograph to this photograph, which is extracted from a quality and featured image. As a featured image, the photograph is "considered one of the finest images" on Commons. The existing infobox image demonstrates poor composition, shows the building undergoing maintenance, and has significant perspective distortion. It also fails to capture the building's two tower nature. Thoughts? Filetime (talk) 20:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Filetime @GenQuest We need to discuss the main info-box image. I updated it to Wrigley Building Aerial.jpg from Wrigley Building - Chicago, Illinois.JPG. I updated it to a newer photo, for many reasons, but you reverted it. My main reason's for changing it was due to it being from 2006, with it being from 2006, it's not a updated photo, but Wrigley Building Aerial.jpg is from 2021, which represents the building much better. It also is a higher quality image, and as @Filetime said, "The existing info-box image demonstrates poor composition, shows the building undergoing maintenance, and has significant perspective distortion." I think that the photo I updated is a much better photo, which solves all of the current problems, I look forward to hearing your thoughts on this topic. Lectrician2 (talk) 14:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Option 2 (original image)