The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Billywayne911 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Confirming All 3 are same ip yet different people within same area of a working space and work in the field of history/research/webdesign. We work on numerous projects, some together some not. We are operate independently with our own edits and this probably creates more confusion. DCGene in particular is a paid researcher/writer. After reviewing guidelines should not have been editing as it can be COI and we should have labeled that on all of our usernames. We probably broke a dozen rules after taking a deep wiki dive and now realize are total amateurs. While it has been exciting to find many stories through the research and learn all things wiki, we informed our space about the IP issue and will use wiki as more of a data tool to cross reference. I personally sent a message to Arbitration team a few days ago indicating we will not make any additional edits or defend articles from vandalism or engage in editing conflicts and instead use talk pages or simply let the community work it out. If I do engage it will be in the form of a collaborative effort on talk pages. When I edit going forward it will be minor edits and other topics not pertaining to these topics. If reactivated, how should we disclose multiple people use this ip at a common area? Also can multiple use an account? Additionally the other users on this IP indicated they do not want to reactivate. Billywayne911 (talk) 19:25, 5 July 2022 (UTC)