User talk:Niteowlneils


I am registered at a couple other Wikipedias, but this is the only one I'm likely to see messages on in any reasonable time frame.

User talk:Niteowlneils/Archive1 (20040224-20040925)User talk:Niteowlneils/Archive2 (20040927-20041115)User talk:Niteowlneils/Archive3 (20041116-20041220)User talk:Niteowlneils/Archive4 (20041220-20041220)User talk:Niteowlneils/Archive5 (20050101-20050331)User talk:Niteowlneils/Archive6 (20050401-20050806)

Please undelete RTOS-UH see request, and ping me (kraehe // irc.freenode.net) when done 91.66.23.76 (talk) 05:08, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You write: #Niteowlneils 19:27, 7 August 2005 (UTC) Keeping an article with only 0-10% "keep" votes is outlandish. If 90-100% of the votes are merge/redir and delete, with no clear preference between the two, then merge/redir is the best way to go.[reply]

Thank you for clearing up the "Union Bay" issue. It is much appreciated. Billpeanut 23:08, 7 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Who in heaven's name is User:24? I saw his "oppose" vote on my adminship and this guy has come seemingly out of nowhere. Please tell me this guy's vote won't count. - Lucky 6.9 18:56, 8 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]