Las elecciones presidenciales estadounidenses de 1912 en Alabama tuvieron lugar el 5 de noviembre de 1912, como parte de las elecciones presidenciales estadounidenses de 1912 . Los votantes de Alabama eligieron a doce representantes, o electores, para el Colegio Electoral , que votaron por presidente y vicepresidente .
![]() | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Resultados del condado
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Alabama fue ganada por el presidente de la Universidad de Princeton, Woodrow Wilson ( D - Nueva Jersey ), junto con el gobernador de Indiana Thomas R. Marshall , con el 69,94% del voto popular, contra el 26 ° presidente de los Estados Unidos Theodore Roosevelt ( P - Nueva York ) , con el gobernador de California Hiram Johnson , con el 19,24% del voto popular y el 27 ° presidente de los Estados Unidos, William Howard Taft ( R - Ohio ), con el presidente de la Universidad de Columbia, Nicholas Murray Butler , con el 8,24% del voto popular. [1]
Resultados
Fiesta | Candidato | Votos | % | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Democrático | Woodrow Wilson | 82,438 | 69,94% | |
Progresivo | Theodore Roosevelt | 22,680 | 19,24% | |
Republicano | William Howard Taft | 9,717 | 8,24% | |
Socialista | Eugene V. Debs | 3,029 | 2,57% | |
Independiente | Escribir en | 5 | 0,00% | |
Total de votos | 117,869 | 100% |
Resultados por condado
condado | Woodrow Wilson [2] Demócrata | William Howard Taft [2] Republicano | Theodore Roosevelt [3] Progresivo | Eugene V. Debs [4] Socialista | Margen [a] | Total de votos emitidos | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
# | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
Autauga | 622 | 73,35% | 43 | 5,07% | 127 | 14,98% | 56 | 6,60% | 495 | 58,37% | 848 |
Baldwin | 623 | 67,28% | 37 | 4,00% | 141 | 15,23% | 125 | 13,50% | 482 | 52,05% | 926 |
Barbour | 1,155 | 90,38% | 18 | 1,41% | 88 | 6,89% | 17 | 1,33% | 1.067 | 83,49% | 1,278 |
Bibb | 820 | 71,87% | 40 | 3,51% | 178 | 15,60% | 103 | 9,03% | 642 | 56,27% | 1,141 |
Blount | 1,121 | 48,74% | 567 | 24,65% | 580 | 25,22% | 32 | 1,39% | 541 | 23,52% | 2,300 |
Toro castrado | 736 | 99,19% | 4 | 0,54% | 2 | 0,27% | 0 | 0,00% | 732 [b] | 98,65% | 742 |
Mayordomo | 903 | 83,00% | 86 | 7,90% | 80 | 7,35% | 19 | 1,75% | 817 [b] | 75,09% | 1.088 |
Calhoun | 1,666 | 70,62% | 238 | 10,09% | 423 | 17,93% | 32 | 1,36% | 1,243 | 52,69% | 2,359 |
Cámaras | 1,486 | 90,83% | 28 | 1,71% | 113 | 6,91% | 9 | 0,55% | 1,373 | 83,92% | 1,636 |
Cherokee | 814 | 46,57% | 88 | 5,03% | 799 | 45,71% | 47 | 2,69% | 15 | 0,86% | 1,748 |
Chilton | 880 | 39,18% | 140 | 6,23% | 1,154 | 51,38% | 72 | 3,21% | -274 | -12,20% | 2,246 |
Choctaw | 489 | 86,40% | 7 | 1,24% | 66 | 11,66% | 4 | 0,71% | 423 | 74,73% | 566 |
Clarke | 1.024 | 95,34% | 13 | 1,21% | 12 | 1,12% | 25 | 2,33% | 999 [c] | 93,02% | 1.074 |
Arcilla | 1.109 | 52,46% | 64 | 3,03% | 939 | 44,42% | 2 | 0,09% | 170 | 8,04% | 2,114 |
Cleburne | 691 | 51,72% | 133 | 9,96% | 510 | 38,17% | 2 | 0,15% | 181 | 13,55% | 1.336 |
Café | 1,277 | 70,67% | 68 | 3,76% | 395 | 21,86% | 67 | 3,71% | 882 | 48,81% | 1.807 |
Colbert | 946 | 63,28% | 228 | 15,25% | 242 | 16,19% | 79 | 5,28% | 704 | 47,09% | 1,495 |
Conecuh | 802 | 80,93% | 60 | 6,05% | 103 | 10,39% | 26 | 2,62% | 699 | 70,53% | 991 |
Coosa | 763 | 63,27% | 109 | 9,04% | 317 | 26,29% | 17 | 1,41% | 446 | 36,98% | 1.206 |
Covington | 1,251 | 73,54% | 110 | 6,47% | 147 | 8,64% | 193 | 11,35% | 1.058 [c] | 62,20% | 1,701 |
Crenshaw | 986 | 84,49% | 47 | 4,03% | 127 | 10,88% | 7 | 0,60% | 859 | 73,61% | 1,167 |
Cullman | 1.230 | 42,49% | 264 | 9,12% | 1.374 | 47,46% | 27 | 0,93% | -144 | -4,97% | 2.895 |
Valle | 1.059 | 66,02% | 99 | 6,17% | 443 | 27,62% | 3 | 0,19% | 616 | 38,40% | 1,604 |
Dallas | 1,461 | 96,69% | dieciséis | 1,06% | 18 | 1,19% | dieciséis | 1,06% | 1,443 | 95,50% | 1,511 |
DeKalb | 1.379 | 54,61% | 492 | 19,49% | 623 | 24,67% | 31 | 1,23% | 756 | 29,94% | 2.525 |
Elmore | 1,152 | 81,70% | 81 | 5,74% | 167 | 11,84% | 10 | 0,71% | 985 | 69,86% | 1.410 |
Escambia | 829 | 85,64% | 52 | 5,37% | 74 | 7,64% | 13 | 1,34% | 755 | 78,00% | 968 |
Etowah | 1,511 | 52,18% | 354 | 12,22% | 887 | 30,63% | 144 | 4,97% | 624 | 21,55% | 2.896 |
Fayette | 762 | 50,07% | 434 | 28,52% | 306 | 20,11% | 20 | 1,31% | 328 [b] | 21,55% | 1,522 |
Franklin | 849 | 47,09% | 309 | 17,14% | 570 | 31,61% | 75 | 4,16% | 279 | 15,47% | 1.803 |
Ginebra | 891 | 57,93% | 99 | 6,44% | 511 | 33,22% | 37 | 2,41% | 380 | 24,71% | 1,538 |
Greene | 418 | 81,01% | 4 | 0,78% | 94 | 18,22% | 0 | 0,00% | 324 | 62,79% | 516 |
Sano | 720 | 98,50% | 4 | 0,55% | 7 | 0,96% | 0 | 0,00% | 713 | 97,54% | 731 |
Enrique | 711 | 75,88% | 47 | 5,02% | 153 | 16,33% | 26 | 2,77% | 558 | 59,55% | 937 |
Houston | 1,160 | 70,18% | 82 | 4,96% | 366 | 22,14% | 45 | 2,72% | 794 | 48,03% | 1,653 |
Jackson | 1,597 | 70,82% | 229 | 10,16% | 406 | 18,00% | 23 | 1,02% | 1,191 | 52,82% | 2.255 |
Jefferson | 8.887 | 72,69% | 693 | 5,67% | 2.034 | 16,64% | 612 | 5,01% | 6.853 | 56,05% | 12,226 |
Lamar | 816 | 77,94% | 61 | 5,83% | 160 | 15,28% | 10 | 0,96% | 656 | 62,66% | 1.047 |
Lauderdale | 1,386 | 68,68% | 263 | 13,03% | 297 | 14,72% | 72 | 3,57% | 1.089 | 53,96% | 2.018 |
Lawrence | 643 | 56,70% | 198 | 17,46% | 261 | 23,02% | 32 | 2,82% | 382 | 33,69% | 1,134 |
Sotavento | 1,179 | 88,98% | 43 | 3,25% | 43 | 3,25% | 60 | 4,53% | 1,119 [c] | 84,45% | 1.325 |
Caliza | 1.012 | 83,02% | 90 | 7,38% | 83 | 6,81% | 34 | 2,79% | 922 [b] | 75,64% | 1.219 |
Lowndes | 583 | 97,00% | 4 | 0,67% | 10 | 1,66% | 4 | 0,67% | 573 | 95,34% | 601 |
Macon | 647 | 93,23% | 24 | 3,46% | 23 | 3,31% | 0 | 0,00% | 623 [b] | 89,77% | 694 |
Madison | 2,146 | 78,21% | 150 | 5,47% | 357 | 13,01% | 91 | 3,32% | 1,789 | 65,20% | 2,744 |
Marengo | 1,386 | 97,88% | 9 | 0,64% | 20 | 1,41% | 1 | 0,07% | 1366 | 96,47% | 1.416 |
Marion | 1.098 | 65,05% | 378 | 22,39% | 205 | 12,14% | 7 | 0,41% | 720 [b] | 42,65% | 1,688 |
Marshall | 1,457 | 47,11% | 428 | 13,84% | 1,184 | 38,28% | 24 | 0,78% | 273 | 8,83% | 3,093 |
Móvil | 3.009 | 79,98% | 140 | 3,72% | 445 | 11,83% | 168 | 4,47% | 2.564 | 68,16% | 3.762 |
Monroe | 878 | 97,12% | 2 | 0,22% | 21 | 2,32% | 3 | 0,33% | 857 | 94,80% | 904 |
Montgomery | 3,047 | 94,10% | 43 | 1,33% | 131 | 4,05% | 17 | 0,53% | 2,916 | 90,06% | 3,238 |
Morgan | 1,686 | 71,11% | 241 | 10,16% | 362 | 15,27% | 82 | 3,46% | 1.324 | 55,84% | 2,371 |
Sidra de pera | 731 | 93,84% | 3 | 0,39% | 31 | 3,98% | 14 | 1,80% | 700 | 89,86% | 779 |
Pickens | 815 | 88,01% | 22 | 2,38% | 73 | 7,88% | dieciséis | 1,73% | 742 | 80,13% | 926 |
Lucio | 1,293 | 95,14% | 13 | 0,96% | 48 | 3,53% | 5 | 0,37% | 1.245 | 91,61% | 1,359 |
Randolph | 1,177 | 64,99% | 268 | 14,80% | 366 | 20,21% | 0 | 0,00% | 811 | 44,78% | 1.811 |
Russell | 1,553 | 96,22% | 4 | 0,25% | 35 | 2,17% | 22 | 1,36% | 1,518 | 94,05% | 1,614 |
Shelby | 1,181 | 44,45% | 201 | 7,56% | 1.233 | 46,41% | 42 | 1,58% | -52 | -1,96% | 2.657 |
St. Clair | 787 | 43,50% | 260 | 14,37% | 687 | 37,98% | 75 | 4,15% | 100 | 5,53% | 1.809 |
Sumter | 701 | 97,09% | 9 | 1,25% | 2 | 0,28% | 10 | 1,39% | 691 [c] | 95,71% | 722 |
Talladega | 1.312 | 72,49% | 111 | 6,13% | 386 | 21,33% | 1 | 0,06% | 926 | 51,16% | 1.810 |
Tallapoosa | 1,586 | 86,06% | 84 | 4,56% | 151 | 8,19% | 22 | 1,19% | 1.435 | 77,86% | 1.843 |
Tuscaloosa | 1,695 | 85,22% | 87 | 4,37% | 158 | 7,94% | 49 | 2,46% | 1,537 | 77,28% | 1,989 |
Caminante | 2.063 | 57.71% | 881 | 24,64% | 504 | 14,10% | 127 | 3,55% | 1,182 [b] | 33,06% | 3,575 |
Washington | 405 | 90,20% | 14 | 3,12% | 18 | 4,01% | 12 | 2,67% | 387 | 86,19% | 449 |
Wilcox | 878 | 97,77% | 7 | 0,78% | 7 | 0,78% | 6 | 0,67% | 871 | 96,99% | 898 |
Winston | 508 | 29,88% | 292 | 17,18% | 893 | 52,53% | 7 | 0,41% | -385 | -22,65% | 1.700 |
Totales | 82,438 | 69,89% | 9,717 | 8,24% | 22.770 [d] | 19,30% | 3,029 | 2,57% | 59.668 | 50,59% | 117,954 |
Notas
- ^ Debido a que Roosevelt terminó por delante de Taft en Alabama en su conjunto, todos los márgenes dados son Wilson menos Roosevelt a menos que se indique en el total del condado en cuestión.
- ^ a b c d e f g En este condado donde Taft se ubicó en segundo lugar por delante de Roosevelt, el margen dado es el que hay entre Wilson y Taft.
- ^ a b c d En este condado donde Debs quedó en segundo lugar por delante de Roosevelt y Taft, el margen dado es el que hay entre Wilson y Debs.
- ^ Solo para el boleto de Roosevelt, existen diferencias entre la figura de Géoelections / Edgar Eugene Robinson y la del atlas de Dave Leip, y la primera se usa solo para la tabla del condado.
Referencias
- ^ a b "Resultados de las elecciones presidenciales de 1912 - Alabama" . Atlas de las elecciones estadounidenses de Dave Leip.
- ↑ a b Robinson, Edgar Eugene; El voto presidencial; 1896-1932 (segunda edición), págs. 226–227. Publicado en 1947 por Stanford University Press.
- ^ Géoelections; Voto popular de las elecciones presidenciales de 1912 Archivado el 13 de junio de 2018 en Wayback Machine (archivo .xlsx por 15 €)
- ^ Géoelections; Elección presidencial de 1912 Voto popular por Eugene Debs (archivo .xlsx por 15 €)