Type of site | Fact-checking |
---|---|
Available in | Polish |
Founded | 15 June 2016[1] |
Country of origin | Poland |
Owner | Fundacja Ośrodek Kontroli Obywatelskiej “OKO”[2] |
Editor | |
Key people |
|
URL | Official website ![]() |
OKO.press is a Polish investigative journalism website created on 15 June 2016.[1] The name is a word play on oko, Polish for eye, and an abbreviation for "Ośrodek Kontroli Obywatelskiej" (Centre for Civic Control).
OKO.press is funded by a mix of individual donations and grants, with no revenue from advertising.[5] The site aims to promote democratic values, human rights and transparency of government by publishing fact-finding, research and analysis.[6]
In 2020, the website received the Index on Censorship journalism award.[7]
OKO.press was founded in June 2016, through the Fundacja Ośrodek Kontroli Obywatelskiej "OKO" editors originating from the Polish media company Agora, as a non-profit investigative journalism website.[2] The founding chief editor was Piotr Pacewicz , former deputy chief editor of Gazeta Wyborcza[2] and the founding deputy chief editor Bianka Mikołajewska , formerly of Gazeta Wyborcza and Polityka.[4] OKO.press journalists initially included journalists from Gazeta Wyborcza, Polityka, TVN, and from the Agora regional news station Tok FM.[2] The website is financed through individual donations and grants. In 2019, its income consisted of 80% individual donations and 20% grants. 93% of the readers are from Poland, the rest are mainly from Germany, Great Britain and the United States.[6]
OKO.press describes its aims as investigative journalism, fact-checking of public debate, and stimulating discussion of important themes in the Internet. It states that it promotes democratic values, human rights and government transparency. OKO.press says that it follows twelve fact-checking principles modelled on the United States project PolitiFact.[2] According to Jarosław Kurski , OKO.press was created in the context of a government that was successively removing checks and balances that protected citizens' rights and state institutions from government oppression, and it was intended to be independent of political parties and independent of the Committee for the Defence of Democracy.[1]
OKO.Press has debunked far-right conspiracy theories on Islam in Europe. Academic historian and OKO.press commentator Adam Leszczyński debunked far-right politician Robert Winnicki's comments on Islamic colonisation in 2016. In 2017, deputy editor Bianka Mikołajewska fact-checked a right-wing commentator Tomasz Łysiak's statements that the national independence march did not have tens of thousands of far-right extremists and fascists marching. On review of photographic evidence, Mikołajewska debunked Łysiak's statement, showing significant prevalence of far-right slogans and symbols such as the Nazi flag, Polish eagle, and celtic cross. These two instances of debunking far-right propaganda on Islam exhibits an association with peace journalism.[8]
OKO.press has been including on Duke University Reporters’ Lab list of fact checkers. Widely popular in Poland, in 2020 it was ranked seventh amongst the most authoritative web portals, and first within the new online brands.[9]
OKO.press has an international reputation as an "acclaimed",[3] "well-known investigative journalism outlet".[10]
Between 2018 and 2020 seven vexatious lawsuits by politicians, companies, and business people have been filed against OKO.press.[11][12] In reaction to the 2 April 2020 publication of the article It is better to avoid the museum. What Minister Gliński did with the memory of the Second World War (Polish: Muzeum lepiej omijać szerokim łukiem. Co Minister Gliński zrobił z pamięcią o II wojnie światowej), a lawsuit was filed against OKO.press. The founder and editor-in-chief of OKO.press, Piotr Pacewicz, described the lawsuit as an attack on the freedom of the press and media.[11]
Any attempts at interfering in media in lawsuits aim at having a chilling effect. This involves more than settling a specific dispute. It sends a message: "Beware, you can't do all that you want". Numerous analyses of populist systems emphasise that control over the media is key for populists. Because populists' governance model is based on the highly selective distribution of truth and circulation of many false or manipulated messages. Independent media, which uncovers such lies and manipulations, are all the more dangerous for populists and their grip on power.
— Piotr Pacewicz, statement to ECPMF, Nov 2020[13]
In December 2016, the deputy chief editor of OKO.press, Bianka Mikołajewska, was awarded the 2016 Grand Press
award for "courage in facing new challenges and journalistic accuracy" and "good, hard journalistic work in sticking to the facts ... rather than repeating their interpretation".[14]In early 2020, OKO.press was shortlisted for the Index on Censorship Freedom of Expression Awards, along with Hong Kong Free Press, SOS Médias Burundi and Venezuelan journalist Marco Ruiz Silvera.[15][16] On 16 April 2020, Index on Censorship named OKO.press as the winner, justifying its choice for OKO.press being "one of the first free investigative journalism and fact-checking websites in Poland", for its journalistic work "[paving] the way for other news sources to follow suit", "fighting for immunity from government propaganda", and being "crucial in an environment sliding further and further into authoritarianism and censorship".[7]
In September 2020, OKO.press received the Equality Crowns media award from Campaign Against Homophobia for "analyzing the events concerning the LGBT community in Poland carefully and with dedication".[17]
... according to Piotr Pacewicz, editor-in-chief of OKO press, an acclaimed Polish website for investigative journalism and fact-checking
Others shared content from outlets like Otopress.pl or Propublico.pl, which mimicked the names of well-known investigative journalism outlets, oko.press and propublica.org.