Talk:Extraordinary rendition


Poderias continuar a traduzir? Att 2804:14C:5BB3:8BED:7D42:B280:2BA6:35EA (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just find it rather interesting that this incident has been added as an example of extraorrdinary rendition one day after the flight 4978. After reading the wikipedia page about the Evo Moralles incident, it seems to me that the plane wasn't force to land in Austria, but did so due to the lack of fuel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evo_Morales_grounding_incident

This edit aroused my suspicions since the Russian government's stance on the Ryanair incident is that it already happened with Evo Moralles https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryanair_Flight_4978#Reactions. I just wonder if the person who edited the wiki page is just repeating Russia's talking points. Stoyfan (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it may be time to split this article because of confusion between extraordinary rendition and other cases of international state-sponsored abductions. Oxford Bibliographies defines extraordinary rendition as "forcible abduction in another jurisdiction and transfer to a third state". (This does not apply to any of the non-US cases as far as I can tell.) It also says that "extraordinary rendition refers mainly to the secret US program that was established after 9/11"[1]. Other cases of state-sponsored abduction involve bringing the victim to the country carrying out the abduction, and this is not called "extraordinary rendition" in reliable sources. Examples:

There doesn't seem to be an established name for the more general practice so I think splitting off content that's not related to the US program into a separate article with a descriptive title, such as international state-sponsored abduction, transnational abduction, or extraterritorial abduction would be best. If no one objects I will carry out the split. (t · c) buidhe 03:09, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Makes alot of sense to me 2600:100F:B04A:967C:1D4:231D:6734:661D (talk) 00:17, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]