Megalodon ( Otodus megalodon ), [6] [7] [8] que significa "diente grande", es una especie extinta de tiburón que vivió hace aproximadamente 23 a 3,6 millones de años (mya), durante el Mioceno temprano hasta el Plioceno . [9] Anteriormente se pensaba que era un miembro de la familia Lamnidae y un pariente cercano del gran tiburón blanco ( Carcharodon carcharias ). Sin embargo, ahora se clasifica en la extinta familia Otodontidae , que divergió del gran tiburón blanco durante el Cretácico Inferior . La ubicación de su género aún se debate, los autores lo ubican en Carcharocles , Megaselachus , Otodus o Procarcharodon . Esto se debe a que se han encontrado fósiles de transición que muestran que el megalodon es la cronoespecie final de un linaje de tiburones gigantes originalmente del género Otodus que evolucionó durante el Paleoceno .
Megalodon | |
---|---|
Modelo de mandíbulas de megalodon en el Museo Americano de Historia Natural | |
clasificación cientifica | |
Reino: | Animalia |
Filo: | Chordata |
Clase: | Chondrichthyes |
Pedido: | Lamniformes |
Familia: | † Otodontidae |
Género: | † Otodus |
Especies: | † O. megalodon |
Nombre binomial | |
† Otodus megalodon ( Agassiz , 1843) [1] | |
Sinónimos [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] | |
Lista de sinónimos
|
Si bien se lo considera uno de los depredadores más grandes y poderosos que jamás haya existido, el megalodon solo se conoce a partir de restos fragmentarios, y su apariencia y tamaño máximo son inciertos. Los científicos difieren sobre si se habría parecido más a una versión más robusta del gran tiburón blanco, el tiburón ballena ( Rhincodon typus ), el tiburón peregrino ( Cetorhinus maximus ) o el tiburón tigre de arena ( Carcharias taurus ). La mayoría de las estimaciones del tamaño del megalodón se extrapolan de los dientes, con estimaciones de longitud máxima de hasta 14,2 a 20,3 metros (47 a 67 pies) [7] [8] [10] y estimaciones de longitud promedio de 10,5 metros (34 pies). [11] [12] Las estimaciones sugieren que sus grandes mandíbulas podrían ejercer una fuerza de mordida de hasta 108,500 a 182,200 newtons (24,400 a 41,000 lbf). [13] Sus dientes eran gruesos y robustos, hechos para agarrar presas y romper huesos.
El megalodon probablemente tuvo un impacto importante en la estructura de las comunidades marinas . El registro fósil indica que tuvo una distribución cosmopolita . Probablemente se dirigió a presas grandes, como ballenas , focas y tortugas marinas . Los juveniles habitaban aguas costeras cálidas y se alimentaban de peces y ballenas pequeñas. A diferencia del gran tiburón blanco, que ataca a la presa desde la parte inferior blanda, el megalodon probablemente usó sus fuertes mandíbulas para atravesar la cavidad torácica y perforar el corazón y los pulmones de su presa.
El animal se enfrentó a la competencia de cetáceos comedores de ballenas, como Livyatan y otros cachalotes macroraptoriales y posiblemente orcas ancestrales más pequeñas. Como el tiburón prefería aguas más cálidas, se cree que el enfriamiento oceánico asociado con el inicio de las edades de hielo , junto con la disminución del nivel del mar y la pérdida resultante de áreas de cría adecuadas, también pueden haber contribuido a su declive. Una reducción en la diversidad de las ballenas barbadas y un cambio en su distribución hacia las regiones polares pueden haber reducido la principal fuente de alimento del megalodón. La extinción del tiburón coincide con una tendencia al gigantismo en las ballenas barbadas.
Taxonomía
Nombrar
Según los relatos del Renacimiento , se creía que los gigantescos dientes fósiles triangulares que a menudo se encontraban incrustados en formaciones rocosas eran las lenguas petrificadas, o glossopetrae , de dragones y serpientes . Esta interpretación fue corregida en 1667 por el naturalista danés Nicolas Steno , quien los reconoció como dientes de tiburón y produjo una famosa representación de la cabeza de un tiburón con tales dientes. Describió sus hallazgos en el libro The Head of a Shark Dissected , que también contenía una ilustración de un diente de megalodon. [14] [15] [16]
El naturalista suizo Louis Agassiz dio a este tiburón su nombre científico inicial , Carcharodon megalodon , en su obra de 1843 Recherches sur les poissons fossiles , basada en restos de dientes. [1] [17] El paleontólogo inglés Edward Charlesworth en su artículo de 1837 utilizó el nombre Carcharias megalodon , mientras que citaba a Agassiz como autor, lo que indica que Agassiz describió la especie antes de 1843. El paleontólogo inglés Charles Davies Sherborn en 1928 enumeró una serie de artículos de 1835 de Agassiz como la primera descripción científica del tiburón. [18] El nombre específico megalodon se traduce como "diente grande", del griego antiguo : μέγας , romanizado : (mégas) , lit. 'grande, poderoso' y ὀδούς ( odoús ), "diente". [19] [20] Los dientes del megalodon son morfológicamente similares a los del gran tiburón blanco ( Carcharodon carcharias ), y sobre la base de esta observación, Agassiz asignó megalodon al género Carcharodon . [17] Aunque "megalodon" es un nombre informal para el tiburón, también se le conoce informalmente como el "tiburón blanco gigante", [21] el "tiburón megatooth", el "tiburón de dientes grandes" o "Meg". [22] : 4
Hubo una descripción aparente del tiburón en 1881 clasificándolo como Selache manzonii . [23]
Evolución
Si bien los primeros restos de megalodon se han informado del Oligoceno tardío , hace unos 28 millones de años (mya), [24] [25] hay desacuerdo en cuanto a cuándo apareció, con fechas que van desde los 16 mya. [26] Se ha pensado que el megalodon se extinguió hacia el final del Plioceno , alrededor de 2,6 millones de años; [26] [27] las afirmaciones de dientes de megalodon del Pleistoceno , menores de 2,6 millones de años, se consideran poco fiables. [27] Una evaluación de 2019 traslada la fecha de extinción a principios del Plioceno, 3,6 millones de años. [28]
Megalodon ahora se considera un miembro de la familia Otodontidae , género Otodus , a diferencia de su clasificación anterior en Lamnidae , género Carcharodon . [26] [12] [27] [6] [7] La clasificación de Megalodon en Carcharodon se debió a la similitud dental con el gran tiburón blanco, pero la mayoría de los autores creen actualmente que esto se debe a una evolución convergente . En este modelo, el gran tiburón blanco está más estrechamente relacionado con el extinto mako de dientes anchos ( Isurus hastalis ) que con el megalodon, como lo demuestra una dentición más similar en esos dos tiburones; Los dientes de megalodon tienen estrías mucho más finas que los grandes dientes de tiburón blanco. El gran tiburón blanco está más estrechamente relacionado con el tiburón marrajo ( Isurus spp.), Con un ancestro común alrededor de los 4 millones de años. [17] [29] Los defensores del modelo anterior, en el que el megalodon y el gran tiburón blanco están más estrechamente relacionados, argumentan que las diferencias entre su dentición son mínimas y oscuras. [30] : 23-25
El género Carcharocles contiene actualmente cuatro especies: C. auriculatus , C. angustidens , C. chubutensis y C. megalodon . [22] : 30–31 La evolución de este linaje se caracteriza por el aumento de las estrías, el ensanchamiento de la corona, el desarrollo de una forma más triangular y la desaparición de las cúspides laterales . [22] : 28-31 [31] La evolución en la morfología de los dientes refleja un cambio en las tácticas de depredación de una mordedura de agarre y desgarro a una mordedura de corte, probablemente reflejando un cambio en la elección de presas de peces a cetáceos. [32] Las cúspides laterales finalmente se perdieron en un proceso gradual que tomó aproximadamente 12 millones de años durante la transición entre C. chubutensis y C. megalodon . [32] El género fue propuesto por DS Jordan y H. Hannibal en 1923 para contener C. auriculatus . En la década de 1980, el megalodon fue asignado a Carcharocles . [17] [22] : 30 Antes de esto, en 1960, el ictiólogo francés Edgard Casier erigió el género Procarcharodon , que incluía a esos cuatro tiburones y se consideraba separado del gran tiburón blanco. Ahora se considera un sinónimo menor de Carcharocles . [22] : 30 El género Palaeocarcharodon se erigió junto con Procarcharodon para representar el comienzo del linaje y, en el modelo en el que el megalodon y el gran tiburón blanco están estrechamente relacionados, su último antepasado común. Se cree que es un callejón sin salida evolutivo y no relacionado con los tiburones Carcharocles por los autores que rechazan ese modelo. [30] : 70
Otro modelo de la evolución de este género, también propuesto por Casier en 1960, es que el antepasado directo de los Carcharocles es el tiburón Otodus obliquus , que vivió desde el Paleoceno hasta el Mioceno , de 60 a 13 millones de años. [29] [31] El género Otodus se deriva en última instancia de Cretolamna , un tiburón del período Cretácico . [6] [33] En este modelo, O. obliquus evolucionó a O. aksuaticus , que evolucionó a C. auriculatus , luego a C. angustidens , luego a C. chubutensis y finalmente a C. megalodon .
Another model of the evolution of Carcharocles, proposed in 2001 by paleontologist Michael Benton, is that the three other species are actually a single species of shark that gradually changed over time between the Paleocene and the Pliocene, making it a chronospecies.[22]:17[25][34] Some authors suggest that C. auriculatus, C. angustidens, and C. chubutensis should be classified as a single species in the genus Otodus, leaving C. megalodon the sole member of Carcharocles.[25][35]
The genus Carcharocles may be invalid, and the shark may actually belong in the genus Otodus, making it Otodus megalodon.[4] A 1974 study on Paleogene sharks by Henri Cappetta erected the subgenus Megaselachus, classifying the shark as Otodus (Megaselachus) megalodon, along with O. (M.) chubutensis. A 2006 review of Chondrichthyes elevated Megaselachus to genus, and classified the sharks as Megaselachus megalodon and M. chubutensis.[4] The discovery of fossils assigned to the genus Megalolamna in 2016 led to a re-evaluation of Otodus, which concluded that it is paraphyletic, that is, it consists of a last common ancestor but it does not include all of its descendants. The inclusion of the Carcharocles sharks in Otodus would make it monophyletic, with the sister clade being Megalolamna.[6]
The cladogram below represents the hypothetical relationships between megalodon and other sharks, including the great white shark. Modified from Shimada et al. (2016),[6] Ehret et al, (2009),[29] and the findings of Siversson et al. (2013).[36][37][38]
Lamniformes |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biología
Appearance
One interpretation on how megalodon appeared was that it was a robust-looking shark, and may have had a similar build to the great white shark. The jaws may have been blunter and wider than the great white, and the fins would have also been similar in shape, though thicker due to its size. It may have had a pig-eyed appearance, in that it had small, deep-set eyes.[39]
Another interpretation is that megalodon bore a similarity to the whale shark (Rhincodon typus) or the basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus). The tail fin would have been crescent-shaped, the anal fin and second dorsal fin would have been small, and there would have been a caudal keel present on either side of the tail fin (on the caudal peduncle). This build is common in other large aquatic animals, such as whales, tuna, and other sharks, in order to reduce drag while swimming. The head shape can vary between species as most of the drag-reducing adaptations are toward the tail-end of the animal.[22]:35–36
Since Carcharocles is derived from Otodus, and the two had teeth that bear a close similarity to those of the sand tiger shark (Carcharias taurus), megalodon may have had a build more similar to the sand tiger shark than to other sharks. This is unlikely since the sand tiger shark is a carangiform swimmer which requires faster movement of the tail for propulsion through the water than the great white shark, a thunniform swimmer.[22]:35–36[40]
Size
Due to fragmentary remains, there have been many contradictory size estimates for megalodon, as they can only be drawn from fossil teeth and vertebrae.[41]:87[42] The great white shark has been the basis of reconstruction and size estimation, as it is regarded as the best analogue to megalodon. Several total length estimation methods have been produced from comparing megalodon teeth and vertebrae to those of the great white.[39][43][10][7]
Megalodon size estimates vary depending on the method used, with maximum total length estimates ranging from 14.2–20.3 meters (47–67 ft).[39][10][7] A 2015 study estimated the average total body length at 10.5 meters (34 ft), calculated from 544 megalodon teeth, found throughout geological time and geography, including adults and juveniles.[44][12] In comparison, large great white sharks are generally around 6 meters (20 ft) in length, with a few contentious reports suggesting larger sizes.[45][46][39] The whale shark is the largest living fish, with one large female reported with a precaudal length of 15 meters (49 ft) and an estimated total length of 18.8 meters (62 ft).[45][47] It is possible that different populations of megalodon around the globe had different body sizes and behaviors due to different ecological pressures.[12] Megalodon is thought to have been the largest macropredatory shark that ever lived.[39]
A 2020 study—looking at the dimensions of the modern great white, mako, and Lamna sharks—suggested a 16 meters (52 ft) megalodon would have had a 4.65 m (15.3 ft) long head, 1.41 m (4 ft 8 in) tall gill slits, a 1.62 m (5 ft 4 in) tall dorsal fin, 3.08 m (10 ft 1 in) long pectoral fins, and a 3.85 m (12 ft 8 in) tall tail fin.[8]
Mature male megalodon may have had a body mass of 12.6 to 33.9 metric tons (13.9 to 37.4 short tons), and mature females may have been 27.4 to 59.4 metric tons (30.2 to 65.5 short tons), assuming that males could range in length from 10.5 to 14.3 meters (34 to 47 ft) and females 13.3 to 17 meters (44 to 56 ft).[39]
A 2015 study linking shark size and typical swimming speed estimated that megalodon would have typically swum at 18 kilometers per hour (11 mph)–assuming that its body mass was typically 48 metric tons (53 short tons)–which is consistent with other aquatic creatures of its size, such as the fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) which typically cruises at speeds of 14.5 to 21.5 km/h (9.0 to 13.4 mph).[48]
Its large size may have been due to climatic factors and the abundance of large prey items, and it may have also been influenced by the evolution of regional endothermy (mesothermy) which would have increased its metabolic rate and swimming speed. The otodontid sharks have been considered to have been ectotherms, so on that basis megalodon would have been ectothermic. However, the largest contemporary ectothermic sharks, such as the whale shark, are filter feeders, while lamnids are now known to be regional endotherms, implying some metabolic correlations with a predatory lifestyle. These considerations, as well as tooth oxygen isotopic data and the need for higher burst swimming speeds in macropredators of endothermic prey than ectothermy would allow, imply that otodontids, including megalodon, were probably regional endotherms.[49]
In 2020, Shimada and colleagues suggested large size was instead due to intrauterine cannibalism, where the larger fetus eats the smaller fetus, resulting in progressively larger and larger fetuses, requiring the mother to attain even greater size as well as caloric requirements which would have promoted endothermy. Males would have needed to keep up with female size in order to still effectively copulate (which probably involved latching onto the female with claspers, like modern cartilaginous fish).[50]
Maximum estimates
The first attempt to reconstruct the jaw of megalodon was made by Bashford Dean in 1909, displayed at the American Museum of Natural History. From the dimensions of this jaw reconstruction, it was hypothesized that megalodon could have approached 30 meters (98 ft) in length. Dean had overestimated the size of the cartilage on both jaws, causing it to be too tall.[51][52]
In 1973, John E. Randall, an ichthyologist, used the enamel height (the vertical distance of the blade from the base of the enamel portion of the tooth to its tip) to measure the length of the shark, yielding a maximum length of about 13 meters (43 ft).[53] However, tooth enamel height does not necessarily increase in proportion to the animal's total length.[30]:99
In 1994, marine biologists Patrick J. Schembri and Stephen Papson opined that O. megalodon may have approached a maximum of around 24 to 25 meters (79 to 82 ft) in total length.[54][55]
In 1996, shark researchers Michael D. Gottfried, Leonard Compagno, and S. Curtis Bowman proposed a linear relationship between the great white shark's total length and the height of the largest upper anterior tooth. The proposed relationship is: total length in meters = − (0.096) × [UA maximum height (mm)]-(0.22).[56][39] Using this tooth height regression equation, the authors estimated a total length of 15.9 meters (52 ft) based on a tooth 16.8 centimeters (6.6 in) tall, which the authors considered a conservative maximum estimate. They also compared the ratio between the tooth height and total length of large female great whites to the largest megalodon tooth. A 6-meter (20 ft) long female great white, which the authors considered the largest 'reasonably trustworthy' total length, produced an estimate of 16.8 meters (55 ft). However, based on the largest female great white reported, at 7.1 meters (23 ft), they estimated a maximum estimate of 20.2 meters (66 ft).[39]
In 2002, shark researcher Clifford Jeremiah proposed that total length was proportional to the root width of an upper anterior tooth. He claimed that for every 1 centimeter (0.39 in) of root width, there are approximately 1.4 meters (4.6 ft) of shark length. Jeremiah pointed out that the jaw perimeter of a shark is directly proportional to its total length, with the width of the roots of the largest teeth being a tool for estimating jaw perimeter. The largest tooth in Jeremiah's possession had a root width of about 12 centimeters (4.7 in), which yielded 16.5 meters (54 ft) in total length.[22]:88
In 2002, paleontologist Kenshu Shimada of DePaul University proposed a linear relationship between tooth crown height and total length after conducting anatomical analysis of several specimens, allowing any sized tooth to be used. Shimada stated that the previously proposed methods were based on a less-reliable evaluation of the dental homology between megalodon and the great white shark, and that the growth rate between the crown and root is not isometric, which he considered in his model. Using this model, the upper anterior tooth possessed by Gottfried and colleagues corresponded to a total length of 15 meters (49 ft).[57] Among several specimens found in the Gatún Formation of Panama, one upper lateral tooth was used by other researchers to obtain a total length estimate of 17.9 meters (59 ft) using this method.[35][58]
In 2019, Shimada revisited the size of megalodon and discouraged using non-anterior teeth for estimations, noting that the exact position of isolated non-anterior teeth is difficult to identify. Shimada provided maximum total length estimates using the largest anterior teeth available in museums. The tooth with the tallest crown height known to Shimada, NSM PV-19896, produced a total length estimate of 14.2 meters (47 ft). The tooth with the tallest total height, FMNH PF 11306, was reported at 16.8 centimeters (6.6 in). However, Shimada remeasured the tooth and found it actually to measure 16.2 centimeters (6.4 in). Using the total height tooth regression equation proposed by Gottfried and colleagues produced an estimate of 15.3 meters (50 ft).[7][10]
In 2021, Victor J. Perez, Ronny M. Leder, and Teddy Badaut proposed a method of estimating total length of megalodon from the sum of the tooth crown widths. Using more complete megalodon dentitions, they reconstructed the dental formula and then made comparisons to living sharks. The researchers noted that the 2002 Shimada crown height equations produce wildly varying results for different teeth belonging to the same shark, casting doubt on some of the conclusions of previous studies using that method. Using the largest tooth available to the authors, GHC 6, with a crown width of 13.3 centimeters (5.2 in), they estimated a total length between 17.4 to 24.2 meters (57 to 79 ft) with a mean of 20.3 meters (67 ft).[10]
There are anecdotal reports of teeth larger than those found in museum collections.[7] Gordon Hubbell from Gainesville, Florida, possesses an upper anterior megalodon tooth whose maximum height is 18.4 centimeters (7.25 in), one of the largest known tooth specimens from the shark.[59] In addition, a 2.7-by-3.4-meter (9 by 11 ft) megalodon jaw reconstruction developed by fossil hunter Vito Bertucci contains a tooth whose maximum height is reportedly over 18 centimeters (7 in).[60]
Teeth and bite force
The most common fossils of megalodon are its teeth. Diagnostic characteristics include a triangular shape, robust structure, large size, fine serrations, a lack of lateral denticles, and a visible V-shaped neck (where the root meets the crown).[30]:55[35] The tooth met the jaw at a steep angle, similar to the great white shark. The tooth was anchored by connective tissue fibers, and the roughness of the base may have added to mechanical strength.[61] The lingual side of the tooth, the part facing the tongue, was convex; and the labial side, the other side of the tooth, was slightly convex or flat. The anterior teeth were almost perpendicular to the jaw and symmetrical, whereas the posterior teeth were slanted and asymmetrical.[62]
Megalodon teeth can measure over 180 millimeters (7.1 in) in slant height (diagonal length) and are the largest of any known shark species,[22]:33 implying it was the largest of all macropredatory sharks.[39] In 1989, a nearly complete set of megalodon teeth was discovered in Saitama, Japan. Another nearly complete associated megalodon dentition was excavated from the Yorktown Formations in the United States, and served as the basis of a jaw reconstruction of megalodon at the National Museum of Natural History (USNM). Based on these discoveries, an artificial dental formula was put together for megalodon in 1996.[30]:55[63]
The dental formula of megalodon is: 2.1.7.43.0.8.4. As evident from the formula, megalodon had four kinds of teeth in its jaws: anterior, intermediate, lateral, and posterior. Megalodon's intermediate tooth technically appears to be an upper anterior and is termed as "A3" because it is fairly symmetrical and does not point mesially (side of the tooth toward the midline of the jaws where the left and right jaws meet). Megalodon had a very robust dentition,[30]:20–21 and had over 250 teeth in its jaws, spanning 5 rows.[22]:iv It is possible that large megalodon individuals had jaws spanning roughly 2 meters (6.6 ft) across.[22]:129 The teeth were also serrated, which would have improved efficiency in cutting through flesh or bone.[17][22]:1 The shark may have been able to open its mouth to a 75° angle, though a reconstruction at the USNM approximates a 100° angle.[39]
In 2008, a team of scientists led by S. Wroe conducted an experiment to determine the bite force of the great white shark, using a 2.5-meter (8.2 ft) long specimen, and then isometrically scaled the results for its maximum size and the conservative minimum and maximum body mass of megalodon. They placed the bite force of the latter between 108,514 to 182,201 newtons (24,395 to 40,960 lbf) in a posterior bite, compared to the 18,216 newtons (4,095 lbf) bite force for the largest confirmed great white shark, and 7,400 newtons (1,700 lbf) for the placoderm fish Dunkleosteus. In addition, Wroe and colleagues pointed out that sharks shake sideways while feeding, amplifying the force generated, which would probably have caused the total force experienced by prey to be higher than the estimate.[13][64]
In 2021, Antonio Ballell and Humberto Ferrón used Finite Element Analysis modeling to examine the stress distribution of three types of megalodon teeth and closely related mega-toothed species when exposed to anterior and lateral forces, the latter of which would be generated when a shark shakes its head to tear through flesh. The resulting simulations identified higher levels of stress in megalodon teeth under lateral force loads compared to its precursor species such as O. obliquus and O. angusteidens when tooth size was removed as a factor. This suggests that megalodon teeth were of a different functional significance than previously expected, challenging prior interpretations that megalodon's dental morphology was primarily driven by a dietary shift towards marine mammals. Instead, the authors proposed that it was a byproduct of an increase in body size caused by heterochronic selection.[65]
Internal anatomy
Megalodon is represented in the fossil record by teeth, vertebral centra, and coprolites.[39][66] As with all sharks, the skeleton of megalodon was formed of cartilage rather than bone; consequently most fossil specimens are poorly preserved.[67] To support its large dentition, the jaws of megalodon would have been more massive, stouter, and more strongly developed than those of the great white, which possesses a comparatively gracile dentition. Its chondrocranium, the cartilaginous skull, would have had a blockier and more robust appearance than that of the great white. Its fins were proportional to its larger size.[39]
Some fossil vertebrae have been found. The most notable example is a partially preserved vertebral column of a single specimen, excavated in the Antwerp Basin, Belgium, in 1926. It comprises 150 vertebral centra, with the centra ranging from 55 millimeters (2.2 in) to 155 millimeters (6 in) in diameter. The shark's vertebrae may have gotten much bigger, and scrutiny of the specimen revealed that it had a higher vertebral count than specimens of any known shark, possibly over 200 centra; only the great white approached it.[39] Another partially preserved vertebral column of a megalodon was excavated from the Gram Formation in Denmark in 1983, which comprises 20 vertebral centra, with the centra ranging from 100 millimeters (4 in) to 230 millimeters (9 in) in diameter.[61]
The coprolite remains of megalodon are spiral-shaped, indicating that the shark may have had a spiral valve, a corkscrew-shaped portion of the lower intestines, similar to extant lamniform sharks. Miocene coprolite remains were discovered in Beaufort County, South Carolina, with one measuring 14 cm (5.5 in).[66]
Gottfried and colleagues reconstructed the entire skeleton of megalodon, which was later put on display at the Calvert Marine Museum in the United States and the Iziko South African Museum.[39][31] This reconstruction is 11.3 meters (37 ft) long and represents a mature male,[39]:61 based on the ontogenetic changes a great white shark experiences over the course of its life.[39]:65
Paleobiología
Range and habitat
Megalodon had a cosmopolitan distribution;[26][58] its fossils have been excavated from many parts of the world, including Europe, Africa, the Americas, and Australia.[30]:67[68] It most commonly occurred in subtropical to temperate latitudes.[26][30]:78 It has been found at latitudes up to 55° N; its inferred tolerated temperature range was 1–24 °C (34–75 °F).[note 1] It arguably had the capacity to endure such low temperatures due to mesothermy, the physiological capability of large sharks to conserve metabolic heat by maintaining a higher body temperature than the surrounding water.[26]
Megalodon inhabited a wide range of marine environments (i.e., shallow coastal waters, areas of coastal upwelling, swampy coastal lagoons, sandy littorals, and offshore deep water environments), and exhibited a transient lifestyle. Adult megalodon were not abundant in shallow water environments, and mostly inhabited offshore areas. Megalodon may have moved between coastal and oceanic waters, particularly in different stages of its life cycle.[22]:33[70]
Fossil remains show a trend for specimens to be larger on average in the Southern Hemisphere than in the Northern, with mean lengths of 11.6 and 9.6 meters (38 and 31 ft), respectively; and also larger in the Pacific than the Atlantic, with mean lengths of 10.9 and 9.5 meters (36 and 31 ft) respectively. They do not suggest any trend of changing body size with absolute latitude, or of change in size over time (although the Carcharocles lineage in general is thought to display a trend of increasing size over time). The overall modal length has been estimated at 10.5 meters (34 ft), with the length distribution skewed towards larger individuals, suggesting an ecological or competitive advantage for larger body size.[12]
Locations of fossils
Megalodon had a global distribution and fossils of the shark have been found in many places around the world, bordering all oceans of the Neogene.[71]
Epoch | Formation | State | Continent |
---|---|---|---|
Pliocene | Luanda Formation | Angola | Africa |
Libya | Africa | ||
South Africa | Africa | ||
Castell'Arquato Formation | Italy | Europe | |
Arenas de Huelva Formation | Spain | Europe | |
Esbarrondadoiro Formation | Portugal | Europe | |
Touril Complex Formation | Portugal | Europe | |
Red Crag Formation | United Kingdom | Europe | |
San Mateo Formation | United States | North America | |
Towsley Formation | United States | North America | |
Bone Valley Formation | United States | North America | |
Tamiami Formation | United States | North America | |
Yorktown Formation | United States | North America | |
Highlands Formation | Antigua and Barbuda | North America | |
Refugio Formation | Mexico | North America | |
San Diego Formation | Mexico | North America | |
Tirabuzon Formation | Mexico | North America | |
Onzole Formation | Ecuador | South America | |
Paraguaná Formation | Venezuela | South America | |
Black Rock Sandstone | Australia | Oceania | |
Cameron Inlet Formation | Australia | Oceania | |
Grange Burn Formation | Australia | Oceania | |
Loxton Sand Formation | Australia | Oceania | |
Whaler's Bluff Formation | Australia | Oceania | |
Tangahoe Formation | New Zealand | Oceania | |
Miocene | |||
Egypt | Africa | ||
Madagascar Basin | Madagascar | Africa | |
Nigeria | Africa | ||
Varswater Formation | South Africa | Africa | |
Baripada Limestone | India | Asia | |
Arakida Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Bihoku Group | Japan | Asia | |
Fujina Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Hannoura Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Hongo Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Horimatsu Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Ichishi Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Kurahara Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Maenami Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Matsuyama Group | Japan | Asia | |
Sekinobana Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Suso Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Takakubo Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Tonokita Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Tsurushi Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Wajimazaki Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Yoshii Formation | Japan | Asia | |
Myanmar | Asia | ||
Burgeschleinitz Formation | Austria | Europe | |
Melker Sand Formation | Austria | Europe | |
Rzehakia Formation | Austria | Europe | |
Weissenegg Formation | Austria | Europe | |
Antwerpen Sands Member | Belgium | Europe | |
Cyprus | Europe | ||
Hrušky Formation | Czech Republic | Europe | |
Gram Formation | Denmark | Europe | |
Aquitaine Basin | France | Europe | |
Germany | Europe | ||
Libano Sandstone | Italy | Europe | |
Blue Clay Formation | Malta | Europe | |
Globigerina Limestone[72] | Malta | Europe | |
Aalten Member | Netherlands | Europe | |
Breda Formation | Netherlands | Europe | |
Korytnica Clays | Poland | Europe | |
Leitha Limestone | Poland | Europe | |
Esbarrondadoiro Formation | Portugal | Europe | |
Filakovo Formation | Slovakia | Europe | |
Arjona Formation | Spain | Europe | |
Calcarenites of Sant Elm | Spain | Europe | |
Turkey | Europe | ||
Monterey Formation | United States | North America | |
Puente Formation | United States | North America | |
Purisima Formation | United States | North America | |
San Mateo Formation | United States | North America | |
Santa Margarita Formation | United States | North America | |
Temblor Formation | United States | North America | |
Topanga Formation | United States | North America | |
Bone Valley Formation | United States | North America | |
Calvert Formation | United States | North America | |
Kirkwood Formation | United States | North America | |
Barbados | North America | ||
Cojímar Formation | Cuba | North America | |
Kendance Formation | Grenada | North America | |
Jamaica | North America | ||
Aymamón Limestone | Puerto Rico | North America | |
Almejas Formation | Mexico | North America | |
Carrillo Puerto Formation | Mexico | North America | |
Chagres Formation | Panama | North America | |
Chucunaque Formation | Panama | North America | |
Gatún Formation | Panama | North America | |
Paraná Formation | Argentina | South America | |
Bahía Inglesa Formation | Chile | South America | |
Castilletes Formation | Colombia | South America | |
Miramar Formation | Peru | South America | |
Pisco Formation | Peru | South America | |
Camacho Formation | Uruguay | South America | |
Cantaure Formation | Venezuela | South America | |
Caujarao Formation | Venezuela | South America | |
Socorro Formation | Venezuela | South America | |
Urumaco Formation | Venezuela | South America | |
Batesford Limestone | Australia | Oceania | |
Black Rock Sandstone | Australia | Oceania | |
Gippsland Limestone | Australia | Oceania | |
Mannum Formation | Australia | Oceania | |
Morgan Limestone | Australia | Oceania | |
Port Campbell Limestone | Australia | Oceania | |
Fiji | Oceania | ||
French Polynesia | Oceania |
Prey relationships
Though sharks are generally opportunistic feeders, megalodon's great size, high-speed swimming capability, and powerful jaws, coupled with an impressive feeding apparatus, made it an apex predator capable of consuming a broad spectrum of animals. It was probably one of the most powerful predators to have existed.[30]:71–75[13] A study focusing on calcium isotopes of extinct and extant elasmobranch sharks and rays revealed that megalodon fed at a higher trophic level than the contemporaneous great white shark ("higher up" in the food chain.)[73]
Fossil evidence indicates that megalodon preyed upon many cetacean species, such as dolphins, small whales, cetotheres, squalodontids (shark toothed dolphins), sperm whales, bowhead whales, and rorquals.[51][74][75] In addition to this, they also targeted seals, sirenians, and sea turtles.[70] The shark was an opportunist and piscivorous, and it would have also gone after smaller fish and other sharks.[51] Many whale bones have been found with deep gashes most likely made by their teeth.[30]:75 Various excavations have revealed megalodon teeth lying close to the chewed remains of whales,[30]:75[31] and sometimes in direct association with them.[21]
The feeding ecology of megalodon appears to have varied with age and between sites, like the modern great white. It is plausible that the adult megalodon population off the coast of Peru targeted primarily cetothere whales 2.5 to 7 meters (8.2 to 23 ft) in length and other prey smaller than itself, rather than large whales in the same size class as themselves.[74] Meanwhile, juveniles likely had a diet that consisted more of fish.[35][76]
Competition
Megalodon faced a highly competitive environment.[77] Its position at the top of the food chain[78] probably had a significant impact on the structuring of marine communities.[77][79] Fossil evidence indicates a correlation between megalodon and the emergence and diversification of cetaceans and other marine mammals.[30]:78[77] Juvenile megalodon preferred habitats where small cetaceans were abundant, and adult megalodon preferred habitats where large cetaceans were abundant. Such preferences may have developed shortly after they appeared in the Oligocene.[30]:74–75
Megalodon were contemporaneous with whale-eating toothed whales (particularly macroraptorial sperm whales and squalodontids), which were also probably among the era's apex predators, and provided competition.[77] Some attained gigantic sizes, such as Livyatan, estimated between 13.5 to 17.5 meters (44 to 57 ft). Fossilized teeth of an undetermined species of such physeteroids from Lee Creek Mine, North Carolina, indicate it had a maximum body length of 8–10 m and a maximum lifespan of about 25 years. This is very different from similarly sized modern killer whales that live to 65 years, suggesting that unlike the latter, which are apex predators, these physeteroids were subject to predation from larger species such as megalodon or Livyatan.[80] By the Late Miocene, around 11 mya, macroraptorials experienced a significant decline in abundance and diversity. Other species may have filled this niche in the Pliocene,[77][81] such as the fossil killer whale Orcinus citoniensis which may have been a pack predator and targeted prey larger than itself,[31][82][83][84] but this inference is disputed,[28] and it was probably a generalist predator rather than a marine mammal specialist.[85]
Megalodon may have subjected contemporaneous white sharks to competitive exclusion, as the fossil records indicate that other shark species avoided regions it inhabited by mainly keeping to the colder waters of the time.[86][30]:77 In areas where their ranges seemed to have overlapped, such as in Pliocene Baja California, it is possible that megalodon and the great white shark occupied the area at different times of the year while following different migratory prey.[30]:77[87] Megalodon probably also had a tendency for cannibalism, much like contemporary sharks.[88]
Feeding strategies
Sharks often employ complex hunting strategies to engage large prey animals. Great white shark hunting strategies may be similar to how megalodon hunted its large prey.[89] Megalodon bite marks on whale fossils suggests that it employed different hunting strategies against large prey than the great white shark.[51]
One particular specimen–the remains of a 9-meter (30 ft) long undescribed Miocene baleen whale–provided the first opportunity to quantitatively analyze its attack behavior. Unlike great whites which target the underbelly of their prey, megalodon probably targeted the heart and lungs, with their thick teeth adapted for biting through tough bone, as indicated by bite marks inflicted to the rib cage and other tough bony areas on whale remains.[51] Furthermore, attack patterns could differ for prey of different sizes. Fossil remains of some small cetaceans, for example cetotheres, suggest that they were rammed with great force from below before being killed and eaten, based on compression fractures.[89]
During the Pliocene, larger cetaceans appeared.[90] Megalodon apparently further refined its hunting strategies to cope with these large whales. Numerous fossilized flipper bones and tail vertebrae of large whales from the Pliocene have been found with megalodon bite marks, which suggests that megalodon would immobilize a large whale before killing and feeding on it.[13][51]
Growth and reproduction
In 2021, Shimada and colleagues calculated the growth rate of an approximately 9.2 m (30 ft) individual based on presumably annual growth rings on three of its vertebrae. They estimated the individual died at 46 years of age, with a growth rate of 16 cm (6.3 in) per year, and a length of 2 m (6 ft 7 in) at birth. For a 15 m (49 ft) individual—which they considered to have been the maximum size attainable—this would equate to a lifespan of 88 to 100 years.[91]
Megalodon, like contemporaneous sharks, made use of nursery areas to birth their young in, specifically warm-water coastal environments with large amounts of food and protection from predators.[35] Nursery sites were identified in the Gatún Formation of Panama, the Calvert Formation of Maryland, Banco de Concepción in the Canary Islands,[92] and the Bone Valley Formation of Florida. Given that all extant lamniform sharks give birth to live young, this is believed to have been true of megalodon also.[93] Infant megalodons were around 3.5 meters (11 ft) at their smallest,[39]:61 and the pups were vulnerable to predation by other shark species, such as the great hammerhead shark (Sphyrna mokarran) and the snaggletooth shark (Hemipristis serra).[35] Their dietary preferences display an ontogenetic shift:[39]:65 Young megalodon commonly preyed on fish,[35] sea turtles,[70] dugongs,[22]:129 and small cetaceans; mature megalodon moved to off-shore areas and consumed large cetaceans.[30]:74–75
An exceptional case in the fossil record suggests that juvenile megalodon may have occasionally attacked much larger balaenopterid whales. Three tooth marks apparently from a 4-to-7-meter (13 to 23 ft) long Pliocene shark were found on a rib from an ancestral blue or humpback whale that showed evidence of subsequent healing, which is suspected to have been inflicted by a juvenile megalodon.[94][95]
Extinción
Climate change
The Earth experienced a number of changes during the time period megalodon existed which affected marine life. A cooling trend starting in the Oligocene 35 mya ultimately led to glaciation at the poles. Geological events changed currents and precipitation; among these were the closure of the Central American Seaway and changes in the Tethys Ocean, contributing to the cooling of the oceans. The stalling of the Gulf Stream prevented nutrient-rich water from reaching major marine ecosystems, which may have negatively affected its food sources. The largest fluctuation of sea levels in the Cenozoic era occurred in the Plio-Pleistocene, between around 5 million to 12 thousand years ago, due to the expansion of glaciers at the poles, which negatively impacted coastal environments, and may have contributed to its extinction along with those of several other marine megafaunal species.[96] These oceanographic changes, in particular the sea level drops, may have restricted many of the suitable shallow warm-water nursery sites for megalodon, hindering reproduction.[97] Nursery areas are pivotal for the survival of many shark species, in part because they protect juveniles from predation.[98][35]
As its range did not apparently extend into colder waters, megalodon may not have been able to retain a significant amount of metabolic heat, so its range was restricted to shrinking warmer waters.[97][75][99] Fossil evidence confirms the absence of megalodon in regions around the world where water temperatures had significantly declined during the Pliocene.[30]:77 However, an analysis of the distribution of megalodon over time suggests that temperature change did not play a direct role in its extinction. Its distribution during the Miocene and Pliocene did not correlate with warming and cooling trends; while abundance and distribution declined during the Pliocene, megalodon did show a capacity to inhabit colder latitudes. It was found in locations with a mean temperature ranging from 12 to 27 °C (54 to 81 °F), with a total range of 1 to 33 °C (34 to 91 °F), indicating that the global extent of suitable habitat should not have been greatly affected by the temperature changes that occurred.[26] This is consistent with evidence that it was a mesotherm.[49]
Changing ecosystem
Marine mammals attained their greatest diversity during the Miocene,[30]:71 such as with baleen whales with over 20 recognized Miocene genera in comparison to only six extant genera.[101] Such diversity presented an ideal setting to support a super-predator such as megalodon.[30]:75 By the end of the Miocene, many species of mysticetes had gone extinct;[77] surviving species may have been faster swimmers and thus more elusive prey.[22]:46 Furthermore, after the closure of the Central American Seaway, tropical whales decreased in diversity and abundance.[99] The extinction of megalodon correlates with the decline of many small mysticete lineages, and it is possible that it was quite dependent on them as a food source.[74] Additionally, a marine megafauna extinction during the Pliocene was discovered to have eliminated 36% of all large marine species including 55% of marine mammals, 35% of seabirds, 9% of sharks, and 43% of sea turtles. The extinction was selective for endotherms and mesotherms relative to poikilotherms, implying causation by a decreased food supply[96] and thus consistent with megalodon being mesothermic.[49] Megalodon may have been too large to sustain itself on the declining marine food resources.[97] The cooling of the oceans during the Pliocene might have restricted the access of megalodon to the polar regions, depriving it of the large whales which had migrated there.[99]
Competition from other predators of marine mammals, such as macropredatory sperm whales which appeared in the Miocene, and killer whales and great white sharks in the Pliocene,[77][81][102] may have also contributed to the decline and extinction of megalodon.[26][22]:46–47[97] Fossil records indicate that the new whale-eating cetaceans commonly occurred at high latitudes during the Pliocene, indicating that they could cope with the increasingly prevalent cold water temperatures; but they also occurred in the tropics (e.g., Orcinus sp. in South Africa).[81] The largest macropredatory sperm whales such as Livyatan are best known from the Miocene, but persisted into the Pliocene,[103] while others, such as Hoplocetus and Scaldicetus, survived until the early Pleistocene. These may have occupied a niche similar to that of orcas before eventually being replaced by them.[104]
The extinction of megalodon set the stage for further changes in marine communities. The average body size of baleen whales increased significantly after its disappearance, although possibly due to other, climate-related, causes.[105] Conversely the increase in baleen whale size may have contributed to the extinction of megalodon, as they may have preferred to go after smaller whales; bite marks on large whale species may have come from scavenging sharks. Megalodon may have simply become coextinct with smaller whale species, such as Piscobalaena nana.[100] The extinction of megalodon had a positive impact on other apex predators of the time, such as the great white shark, in some cases spreading to regions where megalodon became absent.[26][102][106] A 2019 study looking at megalodon teeth from the North Pacific suggested that it died out much earlier about 4–3.6 million years ago, before typical prey items went extinct, due to both climate change and resultant range fragmentation, as well as competition from the great white.[28]
En la cultura popular
Megalodon has been portrayed in several works of fiction, including films and novels, and continues to be a popular subject for fiction involving sea monsters.[107] Three individual megalodon, two adults and one juvenile, were portrayed in BBC's 2003 TV documentary series Sea Monsters, where it is defined as a "hazard" of the era.[108] The History Channel's Jurassic Fight Club portrays a megalodon attacking a Brygmophyseter sperm whale in Japan.[109] Several films depict megalodon, such as Shark Attack 3: Megalodon and the Mega Shark series (for instance Mega Shark Versus Giant Octopus and Mega Shark Versus Crocosaurus).[107] The shark appears in the 2017 videogame Ark: Survival Evolved.[110] Some stories, such as Jim Shepard's Tedford and the Megalodon, portray a rediscovery of the shark.[111] Steve Alten's Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror portrays the shark having preyed on dinosaurs with its prologue and cover artwork depicting megalodon killing a Tyrannosaurus in the sea.[112] The sequels to the book also star megalodon: The Trench, Meg: Primal Waters, Meg: Hell's Aquarium, Meg: Nightstalkers, Meg: Generations, and Meg: Origins,[107] and there is a film adaptation entitled The Meg released on 10 August 2018.[113]
Animal Planet's pseudo-documentary Mermaids: The Body Found included an encounter 1.6 mya between a pod of mermaids and a megalodon.[114] Later, in August 2013, the Discovery Channel opened its annual Shark Week series with another film for television, Megalodon: The Monster Shark Lives,[115] a controversial docufiction about the creature that presented alleged evidence in order to suggest that megalodon was still alive. This program received criticism for being completely fictional; for example, all of the supposed scientists depicted were paid actors. In 2014, Discovery re-aired The Monster Shark Lives, along with a new one-hour program, Megalodon: The New Evidence, and an additional fictionalized program entitled Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine, resulting in further backlash from media sources and the scientific community.[51][116][117]
Reports of supposedly fresh megalodon teeth, such as those made by HMS Challenger in 1873 which were erroneously dated to be around 11,000 to 24,000 years old, are probably teeth that were well-preserved by a thick mineral-crust precipitate of manganese dioxide, and so had a lower decomposition rate and retained a white color during fossilization. Fossil megalodon teeth can vary in color from off-white to dark browns and greys, and some fossil teeth may have been redeposited into a younger stratum. The claims that megalodon could remain elusive in the depths, similar to the megamouth shark which was discovered in 1976, are unlikely as the shark lived in warm coastal waters and probably could not survive in the cold and nutrient-poor deep sea environment.[118][119]
Megalodon teeth are the state fossil of North Carolina.[120]
Ver también
- List of prehistoric cartilaginous fish
- Prehistoric fish
- Largest prehistoric organisms
Notas
- ^ Carbonated bioapatite from a megalodon tooth (of unknown source location) dated to 5.75 ± 0.9 Ma in age has been analyzed for isotope ratios of oxygen (18O/16O) and carbon (13C/12C), using a carbonate clumped-isotope thermometer methodology to yield an estimate of the ambient temperature in that individual's environment of 19 ± 4 °C.[69]
Referencias
- ^ a b Agassiz, Louis (1843). Recherches sur les poissons fossiles [Research on the fossil fishes] (in French). Neuchatel: Petitpierre. p. 41.
- ^ "Otodus (Megaselachus) megalodon (Agassiz, 1837)". SharkReferences.com. Retrieved 24 October 2017.
- ^ Eastman, C. R. (1904). Maryland Geological Survey. 2. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University. p. 82.
- ^ a b c Cappetta, H. (1987). "Mesozoic and Cenozoic Elasmobranchii". Handbook of Paleoichthyology. 3B. München, Germany: Friedrich Pfeil. ISBN 978-3-89937-046-1. OCLC 829906016.
- ^ Hay, O. P. (1901). "Bibliography and Catalogue of the Fossil Vertebrata of North America". Bulletin of the United States Geological Society (179): 308.
- ^ a b c d e f Shimada, K.; Chandler, R. E.; Lam, O. L. T.; Tanaka, T.; Ward, D. J. (2016). "A new elusive otodontid shark (Lamniformes: Otodontidae) from the lower Miocene, and comments on the taxonomy of otodontid genera, including the 'megatoothed' clade". Historical Biology. 29 (5): 1–11. doi:10.1080/08912963.2016.1236795. S2CID 89080495.
- ^ a b c d e f g Shimada, Kenshu (2019). "The size of the megatooth shark, Otodus megalodon (Lamniformes: Otodontidae), revisited". Historical Biology: 1–8. doi:10.1080/08912963.2019.1666840. ISSN 0891-2963.
- ^ a b c Cooper, J. A.; Pimiento, C.; Ferrón, H. G.; Benton, M. J. (2020). "Body dimensions of the extinct giant shark Otodus megalodon: a 2D reconstruction". Scientific Reports. 10 (14596): 14596. Bibcode:2020NatSR..1014596C. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-71387-y. PMC 7471939. PMID 32883981.
- ^ "Giant 'megalodon' shark extinct earlier than previously thought". Science Daily. 13 February 2019.
- ^ a b c d e Perez, Victor; Leder, Ronny; Badaut, Teddy (2021). "Body length estimation of Neogene macrophagous lamniform sharks (Carcharodon and Otodus) derived from associated fossil dentitions". Palaeontologia Electronica. doi:10.26879/1140.
- ^ Pimiento, C.; MacFadden, B. J.; Clements, C. F.; Varela, S.; Jaramillo, C.; Velez-Juarbe, J.; Silliman, B. R. (2016). "Geographical distribution patterns of Carcharocles megalodon over time reveal clues about extinction mechanisms". Journal of Biogeography. 43 (8): 1645–1655. doi:10.1111/jbi.12754. S2CID 55776834.
- ^ a b c d e Pimiento, C.; Balk, M. A. (2015). "Body-size trends of the extinct giant shark Carcharocles megalodon: a deep-time perspective on marine apex predators". Paleobiology. 41 (3): 479–490. doi:10.1017/pab.2015.16. PMC 4541548. PMID 26321775.
- ^ a b c d Wroe, S.; Huber, D. R.; Lowry, M.; McHenry, C.; Moreno, K.; Clausen, P.; Ferrara, T. L.; Cunningham, E.; Dean, M. N.; Summers, A. P. (2008). "Three-dimensional computer analysis of white shark jaw mechanics: how hard can a great white bite?" (PDF). Journal of Zoology. 276 (4): 336–342. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2008.00494.x.
- ^ Haven, Kendall (1997). 100 Greatest Science Discoveries of All Time. Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited. pp. 25–26. ISBN 978-1-59158-265-6. OCLC 230807846.
- ^ Hsu, Kuang-Tai (2009). "The Path to Steno's Synthesis on the Animal Origin of Glossopetrae". In Rosenburg, G. D. (ed.). The Revolution in Geology from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment. 203. Boulder, Colorado: Geological Society of America. ISBN 978-0-8137-1203-1. OCLC 608657795.
- ^ Eilperin, J. (2012). Demon Fish. Pantheon Books. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-7156-4352-5.
- ^ a b c d e f Nyberg, K. G.; Ciampaglio C. N.; Wray G. A. (2006). "Tracing the ancestry of the great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias, using morphometric analyses of fossil teeth". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 26 (4): 806–814. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2006)26[806:TTAOTG]2.0.CO;2.
- ^ Keyes, I. W. (2012). "New records of the Elasmobranch C. megalodon (Agassiz) and a review of the genus Carcharodon in the New Zealand fossil record". New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics. 15 (2): 229. doi:10.1080/00288306.1972.10421956.
- ^ μέγας. Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert; A Greek–English Lexicon at the Perseus Project
- ^ ὀδούς. Liddell, Henry George; Scott, Robert; A Greek–English Lexicon at the Perseus Project
- ^ a b Augilera, Orangel A.; García, Luis; Cozzuol, Mario A. (2008). "Giant-toothed white sharks and cetacean trophic interaction from the Pliocene Caribbean Paraguaná Formation". Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 82 (2): 204–208. doi:10.1007/BF02988410. ISSN 0038-2353. S2CID 84251638.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Renz, Mark (2002). Megalodon: Hunting the Hunter. Lehigh Acres, Florida: PaleoPress. pp. 1–159. ISBN 978-0-9719477-0-2. OCLC 52125833.
- ^ Lawley, R. (1881). "Selache manzonii n. sp. – Dente Fossile délia Molassa Miocenica del Monte Titano (Repubblica di San Marino)" [Fossil tooth from Miocene Molasse from Monte Titano (Republic of San Marino)]. Atti della Società Toscana di Scienze Naturali (in Italian). 5: 167–172.
- ^ Yabe, H.; Goto, M.; Kaneko, N. (2004). "Age of Carcharocles megalodon (Lamniformes: Otodontidae): A review of the stratigraphic records". The Palaeontological Society of Japan. 75: 7–15.
- ^ a b c Gottfried, M. D.; Fordyce, R. E. (2001). "An associated specimen of Carcharodon angustidens (Chondrichthyes, Lamnidae) from the Late Oligocene of New Zealand, with comments on Carcharodon interrelationships". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 21 (4): 730–739. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0730:AASOCA]2.0.CO;2.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j Pimiento, C.; MacFadden, B. J.; Clements, C. F.; Varela, S.; Jaramillo, C.; Velez-Juarbe, J.; Silliman, B. R. (2016). "Geographical distribution patterns of Carcharocles megalodon over time reveal clues about extinction mechanisms". Journal of Biogeography. 43 (8): 1645–1655. doi:10.1111/jbi.12754. S2CID 55776834.
- ^ a b c Pimiento, C.; Clements, C. F. (2014). "When Did Carcharocles megalodon Become Extinct? A New Analysis of the Fossil Record". PLOS ONE. 9 (10): e111086. Bibcode:2014PLoSO...9k1086P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111086. PMC 4206505. PMID 25338197.
- ^ a b c Boessenecker, R. W.; Ehret, D. J.; Long, D. J.; Churchill, M.; Martin, E.; Boessenecker, S. J. (2019). "The Early Pliocene extinction of the mega-toothed shark Otodus megalodon: a view from the eastern North Pacific". PeerJ. 7: e6088. doi:10.7717/peerj.6088. PMC 6377595. PMID 30783558.
- ^ a b c d Ehret D. J.; Hubbell G.; Macfadden B. J. (2009). "Exceptional preservation of the white shark Carcharodon from the early Pliocene of Peru". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 29 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1671/039.029.0113. JSTOR 20491064. S2CID 129585445.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s Klimley, Peter; Ainley, David (1996). "Evolution". Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias. San Diego, California: Academic Press. ISBN 978-0-12-415031-7. OCLC 212425118.
- ^ a b c d e Andres, Lutz (2002). "C. megalodon — Megatooth Shark, Carcharodon versus Carcharocles". fossilguy.com. Retrieved 16 January 2008.
- ^ a b Perez, V. J.; Godfrey, S. J.; Kent, B. W.; Weems, R. E.; Nance, J. R. (2019). "The transition between Carcharocles chubutensis and Carcharocles megalodon (Otodontidae, Chondrichthyes): lateral cusplet loss through time". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 38 (6): e1546732. doi:10.1080/02724634.2018.1546732.
- ^ Siverson, M.; Lindgren, J.; Newbrey, M.G.; Cederström, P.; Cook, T.D. (2013). "Late Cretaceous (Cenomanian-Campanian) mid-palaeolatitude sharks of Cretalamna appendiculata type" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica: 2. doi:10.4202/app.2012.0137. S2CID 58906204. Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 October 2013.
- ^ Benton, M. J.; Pearson, P. N. (2001). "Speciation in the fossil record". Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 16 (7): 405–411. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02149-8. PMID 11403874.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Pimiento, Catalina; Ehret, Dana J.; MacFadden, Bruce J.; Hubbell, Gordon (2010). Stepanova, Anna (ed.). "Ancient Nursery Area for the Extinct Giant Shark Megalodon from the Miocene of Panama". PLOS ONE. 5 (5): e10552. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...510552P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010552. PMC 2866656. PMID 20479893.
- ^ Siversson, M.; Lindgren, J.; Newbrey, M.G.; Cederström, P.; Cook, T.D. (2015). "Cenomanian–Campanian (Late Cretaceous) mid-palaeolatitude sharks of Cretalamna appendiculata type" (PDF). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica. 60 (2): 339–384. doi:10.4202/app.2012.0137. S2CID 58906204.
- ^ Vivian, G. (2013). "Research debunks Great White lineage".
- ^ "Palaeontological detective work unravels evolution of megatooth sharks". 2013.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r Gottfried, MD; Compagno, LJV; Bowman, SC (1996). "Size and skeletal anatomy of the giant megatooth shark Carcharodon megalodon". In Klimley; Ainley (eds.). Great White Sharks: The Biology of Carcharodon carcharias. San Diego, California: Academic Press. pp. 55–89. ISBN 978-0124150317.
- ^ "Could Megalodon Have Looked Like a BIG Sandtiger Shark?". Biology of Sharks and Rays. Retrieved 2 September 2017.
- ^ Renz, Mark (2002). Megalodon: Hunting the Hunter. Lehigh Acres, Florida: PaleoPress. pp. 1–159. ISBN 978-0-9719477-0-2. OCLC 52125833.
- ^ Portell, Roger; Hubell, Gordon; Donovan, Stephen; Green, Jeremy; Harper, David; Pickerill, Ron (2008). "Miocene sharks in the Kendeace and Grand Bay formations of Carriacou, The Grenadines, Lesser Antilles" (PDF). Caribbean Journal of Science. 44 (3): 279–286. doi:10.18475/cjos.v44i3.a2. S2CID 87154947. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 July 2011.
- ^ Pimiento, Catalina; Ehret, Dana J.; MacFadden, Bruce J.; Hubbell, Gordon (2010). Stepanova, Anna (ed.). "Ancient Nursery Area for the Extinct Giant Shark Megalodon from the Miocene of Panama". PLOS ONE. 5 (5): e10552. Bibcode:2010PLoSO...510552P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010552. PMC 2866656. PMID 20479893.
- ^ Pimiento, C.; MacFadden, B. J.; Clements, C. F.; Varela, S.; Jaramillo, C.; Velez-Juarbe, J.; Silliman, B. R. (2016). "Geographical distribution patterns of Carcharocles megalodon over time reveal clues about extinction mechanisms". Journal of Biogeography. 43 (8): 1645–1655. doi:10.1111/jbi.12754. S2CID 55776834.
- ^ a b McClain, Craig R.; Balk, Meghan A.; Benfield, Mark C.; Branch, Trevor A.; Chen, Catherine; Cosgrove, James; Dove, Alistair D.M.; Gaskins, Lindsay C.; Helm, Rebecca R.; Hochberg, Frederick G.; Lee, Frank B. (13 January 2015). "Sizing ocean giants: patterns of intraspecific size variation in marine megafauna". PeerJ. 3: e715. doi:10.7717/peerj.715. ISSN 2167-8359. PMC 4304853. PMID 25649000.
- ^ I., Castro, Jose (2011). Sharks of North America. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN 978-0-19-978097-6. OCLC 958576172.
- ^ Borrell, Asunción; Aguilar, Alex; Gazo, Manel; Kumarran, R. P.; Cardona, Luis (1 December 2011). "Stable isotope profiles in whale shark (Rhincodon typus) suggest segregation and dissimilarities in the diet depending on sex and size". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 92 (4): 559–567. doi:10.1007/s10641-011-9879-y. ISSN 1573-5133. S2CID 37683420.
- ^ Jacoby, D. M. P.; Siriwat, P.; Freeman, R.; Carbone, C. (2015). "Is the scaling of swim speed in sharks driven by metabolism?". Biology Letters. 12 (10): 20150781. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2015.0781. PMC 4707698. PMID 26631246.
- ^ a b c Ferrón, H. G. (2017). "Regional endothermy as a trigger for gigantism in some extinct macropredatory sharks". PLOS ONE. 12 (9): e0185185. Bibcode:2017PLoSO..1285185F. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0185185. PMC 5609766. PMID 28938002.
- ^ Shimada, K.; Becker, M. A.; Griffiths, M. L. (2020). "Body, jaw, and dentition lengths of macrophagous lamniform sharks, and body size evolution in Lamniformes with special reference to 'off-the-scale' gigantism of the megatooth shark, Otodus megalodon". Historical Biology: 1–17. doi:10.1080/08912963.2020.1812598.
- ^ a b c d e f g Prothero, D. R. (2015). "Mega-Jaws". The Story of Life in 25 Fossils. New York, New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 96–110. ISBN 978-0-231-17190-8. OCLC 897505111.
- ^ Helfman, G.; Burgess, G. H. (2014). Sharks: The Animal Answer Guide. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 19. ISBN 978-1-4214-1310-5. OCLC 903293986.
- ^ Randall, John E. (1973). "Size of the Great White Shark (Carcharodon)". Science Magazine. 181 (4095): 169–170. Bibcode:1973Sci...181..169R. doi:10.1126/science.181.4095.169. PMID 17746627. S2CID 36607712.
- ^ Schembri, Patrick (1994). "Malta's Natural Heritage". Natural Heritage. In: 105–124.
- ^ Papson, Stephen (1992). "Copyright: Cross the Fin Line of Terror". Journal of American Culture. 15 (4): 67–81. doi:10.1111/j.1542-734X.1992.1504_67.x.
- ^ Gottfried, M. D.; Fordyce, R. E. (2001). "An associated specimen of Carcharodon angustidens (Chondrichthyes, Lamnidae) from the Late Oligocene of New Zealand, with comments on Carcharodon interrelationships". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 21 (4): 730–739. doi:10.1671/0272-4634(2001)021[0730:AASOCA]2.0.CO;2.
- ^ Shimada, Kenshu (2002). "The relationship between the tooth size and total body length in the white shark, Carcharodon carcharias (Lamniformes: Lamnidae)". Journal of Fossil Research. 35 (2): 28–33.
- ^ a b Pimiento, Catalina; Gerardo González-Barba; Dana J. Ehret; Austin J. W. Hendy; Bruce J. MacFadden; Carlos Jaramillo (2013). "Sharks and Rays (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) from the Late Miocene Gatun Formation of Panama" (PDF). Journal of Paleontology. 87 (5): 755–774. doi:10.1666/12-117. S2CID 45662900. Archived from the original (PDF) on 29 October 2013.
- ^ Crane, B. (2017). "A Prehistoric Killer, Buried in Muck". The New Yorker. Retrieved 10 December 2017.
- ^ Mustain, A. (2011). "For Sale: World's Largest Shark Jaws". LiveScience. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- ^ a b Bendix-Almgreen, Svend Erik (1983). "Carcharodon megalodon from the Upper Miocene of Denmark, with comments on elasmobranch tooth enameloid: coronoïn" (PDF). Bulletin of the Geological Society of Denmark. 32: 1–32.
- ^ Reolid, M.; Molina, J. M. (2015). "Record of Carcharocles megalodon in the Eastern Guadalquivir Basin (Upper Miocene, South Spain)". Estudios Geológicos. 71 (2): e032. doi:10.3989/egeol.41828.342.
- ^ Uyeno, T.; Sakamoto, O.; Sekine, H. (1989). "The Description of an Almost Complete Tooth Set of Carcharodon megalodon from a Middle Miocene Bed in the Saitama Prefecture, Japan". Saitama Museum of Natural History Bulletin. 7: 73–85.
- ^ Anderson, P.S.L.; Westneat, M. (2009). "A biomechanical model of feeding kinematics for Dunkleosteus terrelli (Arthrodira, Placodermi)". Paleobiology. 35 (2): 251–269. doi:10.1666/08011.1. S2CID 86203770.
- ^ Ballell, A.; Ferrón, H.G. (2021). "Biomechanical insights into the dentition of megatooth sharks (Lamniformes: Otodontidae)". Scientific Reports. 11 (1232): 1232. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-80323-z. PMC 7806677. PMID 33441828.
- ^ a b Stringer, G. L.; King, L. (2012). "Late Eocene Shark Coprolites from the Yazoo Clay in Northeastern Louisiana". New Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Bulletin. Vertebrate Corpolites. 57: 301.
- ^ "Megalodon Shark Facts and Information: The Details". fossilguy.com. Retrieved 18 September 2017.
- ^ Fitzgerald, Erich (2004). "A review of the Tertiary fossil Cetacea (Mammalia) localities in Australia". Memoirs of Museum Victoria. 61 (2): 183–208. doi:10.24199/j.mmv.2004.61.12.
- ^ Löffler, N.; Fiebig, J.; Mulch, A.; Tütken, T.; Schmidt, B.C.; Bajnai, D.; Conrad, A.C.; Wacker, U.; Böttcher, M.E. (2019). "Refining the temperature dependence of the oxygen and clumped isotopic compositions of structurally bound carbonate in apatite". Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta. 253: 19–38. Bibcode:2019GeCoA.253...19L. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2019.03.002.
- ^ a b c Aguilera O.; Augilera E. R. D. (2004). "Giant-toothed White Sharks and Wide-toothed Mako (Lamnidae) from the Venezuela Neogene: Their Role in the Caribbean, Shallow-water Fish Assemblage". Caribbean Journal of Science. 40 (3): 362–368.
- ^ a b Carcharocles megalodon at fossilworks.org (retrieved 28 August 2017)
- ^ "Young Prince George gifted 23m-year-old tooth from extinct shark found in Malta". Times of Malta. 27 September 2020. Retrieved 28 September 2020.
- ^ Martin, J. E.; Tacail, T.; Sylvain, A.; Catherine, G.; Vincent, B. (2015). "Calcium isotopes reveal the trophic position of extant and fossil elasmobranchs". Chemical Geology. 415: 118–125. Bibcode:2015ChGeo.415..118M. doi:10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.09.011.
- ^ a b c Collareta, A.; Lambert, O.; Landini, W.; Di Celma, C.; Malinverno, E.; Varas-Malca, R.; Urbina, M.; Bianucci, G. (2017). "Did the giant extinct shark Carcharocles megalodon target small prey? Bite marks on marine mammal remains from the late Miocene of Peru". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 469: 84–91. Bibcode:2017PPP...469...84C. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.01.001.
- ^ a b Morgan, Gary S. (1994). "Whither the giant white shark?" (PDF). Paleontology Topics. 2 (3): 1–2. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 July 2016.
- ^ Landini, W.; Altamirano-Sera, A.; Collareta, A.; Di Celma, C.; Urbina, M.; Bianucci, G. (2017). "The late Miocene elasmobranch assemblage from Cerro Colorado (Pisco Formation, Peru)". Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 73: 168–190. Bibcode:2017JSAES..73..168L. doi:10.1016/j.jsames.2016.12.010.
- ^ a b c d e f g h Lambert, O.; Bianucci, G.; Post, P.; de Muizon, C.; Salas-Gismondi, R.; Urbina, M.; Reumer, J. (2010). "The giant bite of a new raptorial sperm whale from the Miocene epoch of Peru". Nature. 466 (7302): 105–108. Bibcode:2010Natur.466..105L. doi:10.1038/nature09067. PMID 20596020. S2CID 4369352.
- ^ Compagno, Leonard J. V. (1989). "Alternative life-history styles of cartilaginous fishes in time and space". Environmental Biology of Fishes. 28 (1–4): 33–75. doi:10.1007/BF00751027. S2CID 22527888.
- ^ Ferretti, Francesco; Boris Worm; Gregory L. Britten; Michael R. Heithaus; Heike K. Lotze1 (2010). "Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean" (PDF). Ecology Letters. 13 (8): 1055–1071. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01489.x. PMID 20528897. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 19 February 2011.
- ^ Gilbert, K.N.; Ivany, L.C.; Uhen, M.D. (2018). "Living fast and dying young: life history and ecology of a Neogene sperm whale". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 38 (2): e1439038. doi:10.1080/02724634.2018.1439038. S2CID 89750852.
- ^ a b c Heyning, John; Dahlheim, Marilyn (1988). "Orcinus orca" (PDF). Mammalian Species. 304 (304): 1–9. doi:10.2307/3504225. JSTOR 3504225. Archived from the original (PDF) on 5 December 2010.
- ^ Bianucci, Giovanni; Walter, Landini (2006). "Killer sperm whale: a new basal physeteroid (Mammalia, Cetacea) from the Late Miocene of Italy". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 148 (1): 103–131. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.2006.00228.x.
- ^ Lindberg, D. R.; Pyenson, N. D. (2006). "Evolutionary Patterns in Cetacea: Fishing Up Prey Size through Deep Time". Whales, Whaling, and Ocean Ecosystems. University of California Press. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-520-24884-7.
- ^ Boessenecker, R. W. (2013). "A new marine vertebrate assemblage from the Late Neogene Purisima Formation in Central California, part II: Pinnipeds and Cetaceans". Geodiversitas. 35 (4): 815–940. doi:10.5252/g2013n4a5. S2CID 85940452.
- ^ Bianucci, G. (1997). "Hemisyntrachelus cortesii (Cetacea, Delphinidae) from the Pliocene Sediments of Campore Quarry (Salsomaggiori Terme, Italy". Bollettino della Societa Paleontologica Italiana. 36 (1): 75–83).
- ^ Antunes, M.T.; Legoinha, P.; Balbing, A. (2015). "Megalodon, mako shark and planktonic foraminifera from the continental shelf off Portugal and their age". Geologica Acta. 13: 181–190.
- ^ "Paleoecology of Megalodon and the White Shark". Biology of Sharks and Rays. Retrieved 1 October 2017.
- ^ Tanke, Darren; Currie, Philip (1998). "Head-Biting Behaviour in Theropod Dinosaurs: Paleopathological Evidence" (PDF). Gaia (15): 167–184.
- ^ a b Godfrey, S. J.; Altman, J. (2005). "A Miocene Cetacean Vertebra Showing a Partially Healed Compression Factor, the Result of Convulsions or Failed Predation by the Giant White Shark, Carcharodon megalodon" (PDF). Jeffersoniana (16): 1–12.
- ^ Deméré, Thomas A.; Berta, Annalisa; McGowen, Michael R. (2005). "The taxonomic and evolutionary history of fossil and modern balaenopteroid mysticetes". Journal of Mammalian Evolution. 12 (1/2): 99–143. doi:10.1007/s10914-005-6944-3. S2CID 90231.
- ^ S., Kenshu; Bonnan, M. F.; Becker, M. A.; Griffiths, M. L. (2021). "Ontogenetic growth pattern of the extinct megatooth shark Otodus megalodon—implications for its reproductive biology, development, and life expectancy". Historical Biology: 1–6. doi:10.1080/08912963.2020.1861608.
- ^ "Identifican en Canarias fósiles de 'megalodón', el tiburón más grande que ha existido" [Identifying Canary fossils of 'megalodon', the largest shark that ever lived] (in Spanish). Europa Press Noticias SA. 2013. Retrieved 29 August 2017.
- ^ Dulvy, N. K.; Reynolds, J. D. (1997). "Evolutionary transitions among egg-laying, live-bearing and maternal inputs in sharks and rays". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 264 (1386): 1309–1315. Bibcode:1997RSPSB.264.1309D. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0181. PMC 1688595.
- ^ Godfrey, Stephen (2004). "The Ecphora" (PDF). The Newsletter of Calvert Marine Museum Fossil Club. 19 (1): 1–13. Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 December 2010.
- ^ Kallal, R. J.; Godfrey, S. J.; Ortner, D. J. (27 August 2010). "Bone Reactions on a Pliocene Cetacean Rib Indicate Short-Term Survival of Predation Event". International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. 22 (3): 253–260. doi:10.1002/oa.1199.
- ^ a b Pimiento, C.; Griffin, J. N.; Clements, C. F.; Silvestro, D.; Varela, S.; Uhen, M. D.; Jaramillo, C. (2017). "The Pleistocene Marine Megafauna Extinction and its Impact on Functional Diversity". Nature Ecology and Evolution. 1 (8): 1100–1106. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0223-6. PMID 29046566. S2CID 3639394.
- ^ a b c d "The Extinction of Megalodon". Biology of Sharks and Rays. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- ^ Reilly, Michael (29 September 2009). "Prehistoric Shark Nursery Spawned Giants". Discovery News. Archived from the original on 10 March 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2013.
- ^ a b c Allmon, Warren D.; Steven D. Emslie; Douglas S. Jones; Gary S. Morgan (2006). "Late Neogene Oceanographic Change along Florida's West Coast: Evidence and Mechanisms". The Journal of Geology. 104 (2): 143–162. Bibcode:1996JG....104..143A. doi:10.1086/629811. S2CID 128418299.
- ^ a b Collareta, A.; Lambert, O.; Landini, W.; Bianucci, G. (2017). "Did the giant extinct shark Carcharocles megalodon target small prey? Bite marks on marine mammal remains from the late Miocene of Peru". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 469: 84–91. Bibcode:2017PPP...469...84C. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2017.01.001.
- ^ Dooly A.C.; Nicholas C. F.; Luo Z. X. (2006). "The earliest known member of the rorqual—gray whale clade (Mammalia, Cetacea)". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 24 (2): 453–463. doi:10.1671/2401. JSTOR 4524731. S2CID 84970052.
- ^ a b Antunes, Miguel Telles; Balbino, Ausenda Cáceres (2010). "The Great White Shark Carcharodon carcharias (Linne, 1758) in the Pliocene of Portugal and its Early Distribution in Eastern Atlantic". Revista Española de Paleontología. 25 (1): 1–6.
- ^ "Huge Tooth Reveals Prehistoric Moby Dick in Melbourne". Australasian Science Magazine. Retrieved 24 April 2016.
- ^ Hampe, O. (2006). "Middle/late Miocene hoplocetine sperm whale remains (Odontoceti: Physeteridae) of North Germany with an emended classification of the Hoplocetinae". Fossil Record. 9 (1): 61–86. doi:10.1002/mmng.200600002.
- ^ Slater, G. J.; Goldbogen, J. A.; Pyenson, N. D. (2017). "Independent evolution of baleen whale gigantism linked to Plio-Pleistocene ocean dynamics". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 284 (1855): 20170546. doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0546. PMC 5454272. PMID 28539520.
- ^ Sylvain, Adnet; A. C. Balbino; M. T. Antunes; J. M. Marín-Ferrer (2010). "New fossil teeth of the White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) from the Early Pliocene of Spain. Implication for its paleoecology in the Mediterranean". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie. 256 (1): 7–16. doi:10.1127/0077-7749/2009/0029.
- ^ a b c Weinstock, J. A. (2014). The Ashgate Encyclopedia of Literary and Cinematic Monsters. Farnham, United Kingdom: Routledge. pp. 107–108. ISBN 978-1-4094-2562-5. OCLC 874390267.
- ^ "The Third Most Deadly Sea". Sea Monsters. Season 1. Episode 3. 23 September 2003. BBC.
- ^ "Deep Sea Killers". Jurassic Fight Club. Season 1. Episode 5. 26 August 2008. History Channel.
- ^ "Megalodon". ARK Survival Evolved. Retrieved 9 August 2018.
- ^ Shepard, J. (2007). "Tedford and the Megalodon". In Chabon, M. (ed.). McSweeney's Mammoth Treasury of Thrilling Tales. New York, New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-307-42682-6. OCLC 1002088939.
- ^ Alten, S. (2011). "Megalodon". Meg: A Novel of Deep Terror. Portland, Oregon: Gere Donovan Press. ISBN 978-1-936666-21-8.
- ^ McNary, Dave (2 March 2017). "Jason Statham's Shark Thriller 'Meg' Swims Back Five Months". Variety. Retrieved 15 April 2018.
- ^ Sid Bennett (director) (27 May 2012). Mermaids: The Body Found (Motion picture). Animal Planet.
- ^ "Shark Week 'Megalodon: The Monster Shark Lives' Tries To Prove Existence Of Prehistoric Shark (VIDEO)". Huff Post Green. 5 August 2013. Retrieved 11 August 2013.
- ^ Winston, B.; Vanstone, G.; Chi, W. (2017). "A Walk in the Woods". The Act of Documenting: Documentary Film in the 21st Century. New York, New York: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1-5013-0918-2. OCLC 961183719.
- ^ Flanagin, J. (2014). "Sorry, Fans. Discovery Has Jumped the Shark Week". New York Times. Retrieved 16 August 2014.
- ^ Roesch, B. S. (1998). "A Critical Evaluation of the Supposed Contemporary Existence of Carcharocles megalodon". The Cryptozoology Review. 3 (2): 14–24.
- ^ "Does Megalodon Still Live?". Biology of Sharks and Rays. Retrieved 2 October 2017.
- ^ "Fossil, Fossilized Teeth of the Megalodon Shark | NCpedia". ncpedia.org. Retrieved 17 October 2019.
Otras lecturas
- Dickson, K. A.; Graham, J. B. (November–December 2004). "Evolution and consequences of endothermy in fishes". Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 77 (6): 998–1018. doi:10.1086/423743. PMID 15674772. S2CID 40104003.
- Kent, Bretton W. (1994). Fossil Sharks of the Chesapeake Bay Region. Columbia, Md.: Egan Rees & Boyer. ISBN 978-1-881620-01-3. OCLC 918266672.
enlaces externos
- The rise of super predatory sharks
- Carcharocles: Extinct Megatoothed shark
- Paleontological videos
- Paleontologist Mark Renz shows one of the largest megalodon teeth discovered on YouTube
- Shark Week Special on megalodon with Pat McCarthy and John Babiarz on YouTube with comments on its extinction.
- Megalodon fossil teeth show evidence of 10-million-year-old shark nursery on YouTube
- Expert view: information about megalodon on YouTube (featuring expert Dana Ehret)
- Lamniform sharks: 110 million years of ocean supremacy on YouTube (featuring expert Mikael Siverson)
- The Rise and Fall of the Neogene Giant Sharks on YouTube (featuring expert Bretton Kent)
- Moore, Kallie (19 December 2018). "Why Megalodon (Definitely) Went Extinct". PBS Eons – via YouTube.