Looking randomly at these entries, a large number are not 'homegrown' in the sense that is in the linked article (ie they are often/usually residents, but not citizens, nor even 'raised' in the country attacked). This appears to be especially true of modern 'terrorist' attacks in Europe. Pincrete (talk) 15:19, 22 August 2017 (UTC)
I have just modified 3 external links on List of rampage killers (religious, political or racial crimes). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
I know that Wikipedia is not censored, but I think ranking these killers by number of victims (by default, at least) might encourage people to try to kill as many people as possible, or at least "celebrates" the accomplishments of the killers. Perhaps ordering by date of the killing would be better? --Alexschmidt711 (talk) 17:54, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
I agree with this but how else could it be efficiently done to show the scope of these horrid things. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:19D:301:9970:919C:7D6D:FD5:9716 (talk) 06:34, 27 November 2020 (UTC)